Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31386006›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2019

Neuro-Oncology Clinical Debate: PCV or temozolomide in combination with radiation for newly diagnosed high-grade oligodendroglioma.

Michael W Ruff, Jan C Buckner, Derek R Johnson, Martin J van den Bent, Marjolein Geurts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Updates on management of gliomas in the molecular age.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael W RuffDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jan C BucknerDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-266X
Derek R JohnsonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-5517
Martin J van den BentThe Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-5127
Marjolein GeurtsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-0035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma has been revolutionized in the past decade by multiple studies demonstrating that the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy results in a significant survival benefit. While the most direct evidence comes from clinical trials that utilized PCV, a chemotherapy regimen consisting of procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine), and vincristine, there is circumstantial evidence suggesting that the oral agent temozolomide (TMZ), which is both better tolerated and logistically simpler than PCV, may also be effective. The lack of currently available direct comparative data for PCV vs TMZ results in a diversity of practice. In this article, Ruff and Buckner argue for PCV as part of the standard-of-care regimen for newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma, while Geurts and van den Bent defend the use of TMZ.

Indexed as

glioblastomagliomalomustineoligodendrogliomaPCVtemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID31386006
PMCPMC6656310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.