Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385800›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2019

Donor Iron Deficiency Study (DIDS): protocol of a study to test whether iron deficiency in blood donors affects red blood cell recovery after transfusion.

Zachary C Bitan, Alice Zhou, Donald J McMahon, Debra Kessler, Beth H Shaz, Elise Caccappolo, Joseph Schwartz, Richard O Francis, Gary M Brittenham, Steven L Spitalnik and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Personalised Transfusion Medicine.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary C BitanPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Alice ZhouPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Donald J McMahonPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Debra KesslerNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Beth H ShazNew York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Elise CaccappoloCognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Joseph SchwartzPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Richard O FrancisPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Gary M BrittenhamPediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Steven L SpitalnikPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
Eldad A HodPathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.
New York Blood Center · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Red blood cells from iron-deficient donors: recovery and storage qualityR01HL133049 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOD, ELDAD ARIE, SPITALNIK, STEVEN L · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite fulfilling all requirements for blood donation, a large proportion of regular blood donors are iron deficient. Red blood cells (RBC) from iron-deficient donors may be particularly susceptible to damage induced by standard refrigerated storage. Herein, we present a study protocol for testing whether correcting iron deficiency in donors with iron-deficient erythropoiesis will improve the quality of their refrigerator-stored RBC. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Sixty healthy regular donors who meet donation standards, while exhibiting iron-deficient erythropoiesis by laboratory testing criteria, will donate a single standard RBC unit that will be leucoreduced and stored in a refrigerator under standard conditions for 40-42 days. A

resultsThe primary endpoint will be the change in 24-hour post-transfusion recovery from the first to the second donation. The primary outcome will be the group mean difference in the primary endpoints between the group receiving intravenous saline and the group receiving intravenous iron dextran. Secondary outcomes will be quality of life, fatigue, and emotional health, assessed by surveys.

conclusionThis study will provide definitive evidence as to whether donor iron deficiency affects the quality of the blood supply and will assess the severity of symptoms affecting iron-deficient blood donors.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyBlood DonorsErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionBlood PreservationDonor SelectionDouble-Blind MethodErythrocyte CountErythropoiesisFemaleHematinicsHumansIron-Dextran ComplexMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHematinicsIron-Dextran Complex

Identifiers

PMID31385800
PMCPMC6683873
OpenAlexW2997809960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.