ArticleRadiology2019
Radiomics versus Visual and Histogram-based Assessment to Identify Atheromatous Lesions at Coronary CT Angiography: An ex Vivo Study.
Article in Radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Machine Learning Models in Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events Prediction Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of science and reporting for radiomics in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies: a systematic review.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Development and application of artificial intelligence in cardiac imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Coronary Plaque Radiomic Phenotypes Predict Fatal or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of the SCOT-HEART Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Trial
- Prediction of acute coronary syndrome within 3 years using radiomics signature of pericoronary adipose tissue based on coronary computed tomography angiography.European radiology · 2022Trial
- Association of Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque Shape and Degree of Intraplaque Embeddedness Using Atherosclerotic Imaging-enabled Quantitative CT with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2026Article
- Incidental Finding of Coronary and Non-Coronary Artery Calcium: What Do Clinicians Need To Know?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Computed Tomography Advancements in Plaque Analysis: From Histology to Comprehensive Plaque Burden Assessment.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning for Evaluating Vulnerable Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Using Spectral Imaging.Circulation reports · 2024Article
- Special Report on the Consensus QIBA Profile for Objective Analytical Validation of Non-calcified and High-risk Plaque and Other Biomarkers using Computed Tomography Angiography.Academic radiology · 2024Article
- Advancements in Cardiac CT Imaging: The Era of Artificial Intelligence.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Using artificial intelligence to study atherosclerosis from computed tomography imaging: A state-of-the-art review of the current literature.Atherosclerosis · 2024Review
- Intraindividual reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features between energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector CT angiography.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Radiomic nomogram for predicting high-risk cytogenetic status in multiple myeloma based on fat-suppressed T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Article
- Computed Tomography Angiography Identified High-Risk Coronary Plaques: From Diagnosis to Prognosis and Future Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Multimodal Cardiac Imaging Revisited by Artificial Intelligence: An Innovative Way of Assessment or Just an Aid?Cureus · 2024Review
- Protocol and rationale of the Australian multicentre registry for serial cardiac computed tomography angiography (ARISTOCRAT): a prospective observational study of the natural history of pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and radiomics.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Article
- Identification of Multiclass Pediatric Low-Grade Neuroepithelial Tumor Molecular Subtype with ADC MR Imaging and Machine Learning.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Application of Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Radiomics-based discrimination of coronary chronic total occlusion and subtotal occlusion on coronary computed tomography angiography.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Visual and histogram-based assessments of coronary CT angiography have limited accuracy in the identification of advanced lesions. Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) could provide a more accurate tool. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of radiomics-based ML with that of visual and histogram-based assessment of ex vivo coronary CT angiography cross sections to identify advanced atherosclerotic lesions defined with histologic examination. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 21 coronary arteries from seven hearts obtained from male donors (mean age, 52.3 years ± 5.3) were imaged ex vivo with coronary CT angiography between February 23, 2009, and July 31, 2010. From 95 coronary plaques, 611 histologic cross sections were coregistered with coronary CT cross sections. Lesions were considered advanced if early fibroatheroma, late fibroatheroma, or thin-cap atheroma was present. CT cross sections were classified as showing homogeneous, heterogeneous, or napkin-ring sign plaques on the basis of visual assessment. The area of low attenuation (<30 HU) and the average Hounsfield unit were quantified. Radiomic parameters were extracted and used as inputs to ML algorithms. Eight radiomics-based ML models were trained on randomly selected cross sections (training set, 75% of the cross sections) to identify advanced lesions. Visual assessment, histogram-based assessment, and the best ML model were compared on the remaining 25% of the data (validation set) by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to identify advanced lesions. Results After excluding sections with no visible plaque (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.