Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385629›Full record

ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2019

Assessment of kidney transplant suitability for patients with prior cancers: is it time for a rethink?

Wai H Lim, Eric Au, Anoushka Krishnan, Germaine Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Kidney retransplantation after anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)-related allograft rejection.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  7. Post renal-transplant malignancy surveillance.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wai H LimDepartment of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-3572
Eric AuSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anoushka KrishnanDepartment of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Clinical Research Fellowship from the Raine FoundationHealth Department of Western AustraliaNational Health and Medical Research Council Career Development FellowshipUniversity of Western Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients have up to a 100-fold greater risk of incident cancer compared with the age/sex-matched general population, attributed largely to chronic immunosuppression. In patients with a prior history of treated cancers, the type, stage and the potential for cancer recurrence post-transplant of prior cancers are important factors when determining transplant suitability. Consequently, one of the predicaments facing transplant clinicians is to determine whether patients with prior cancers are eligible for transplantation, balancing between the accelerated risk of death on dialysis, the projected survival benefit and quality of life gains with transplantation, and the premature mortality associated with the potential risk of cancer recurrence post-transplant. The guidelines informing transplant eligibility or screening and preventive strategies against cancer recurrence for patients with prior cancers are inconsistent, underpinned by uncertain evidence on the estimates of the incidence of cancer recurrence and the lack of stage-specific outcomes data, particularly among those with multiple myeloma or immune-driven malignancies such as melanomas. With the advent of newer anti-cancer treatment options, it is unclear whether the current guidelines for those with prior cancers remain appropriate. This review will summarize the uncertainties of evidence informing the current recommendations regarding transplant eligibility of patients with prior cancers.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHumansKidney TransplantationMelanomaMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesWaiting ListsTOR Serine-Threonine Kinaseskidney transplantmelanomamyelomaPrior cancerstransplant suitability

Identifiers

PMID31385629
PMCPMC6900036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.