ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019
Air pollution exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion in the Nurses' Health Study II.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Silent Harm: How Ambient Air Pollution Threatens Prenatal and Neonatal Health. A Systematic Review.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2025Pooled it
- Air pollution's toll on adverse birth outcomes: key research insights from Chinese epidemiological studies.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Indoor and outdoor air pollution and couple fecundability: a systematic review.Human reproduction update · 2023Pooled it
- Mendelian randomization reveals the associations between modifiable risk factors and intermediate phenotypes and spontaneous abortion.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Impact of climate change on spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Association of fine particulate matter exposure during pregnancy and stillbirth rates in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Ambient air pollution in critical windows of exposure and spontaneous miscarriage in a preconception cohort.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Article
- Interpregnancy Interval After Healthy Live Birth and Subsequent Spontaneous Abortion.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Prenatal exposure to air pollutant mixtures and birthweight in the upstate KIDS cohort.Environment international · 2024Article
- Ambient air pollution and rate of spontaneous abortion.Environmental research · 2024Article
- Air pollution and pregnancy.Seminars in perinatology · 2023Article
- Associations between maternal occupational exposures and pregnancy outcomes among Chinese nurses: a nationwide study.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Maternal Exposure to PMCirculation · 2023Article
- Susceptible windows of exposure to fine particulate matter and fetal growth trajectories in the Spanish INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente) birth cohort.Environmental research · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal Patterns of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Rural Areas of Henan, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Estimation of stillbirths attributable to ambient fine particles in 137 countries.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Integrated single-cell RNA-seq and DNA methylation reveal the effects of air pollution in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Article
- Perception of worry of harm from air pollution: results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).BMC public health · 2022Article
- Ambient air pollution exposure assessments in fertility studies: A systematic review and guide for reproductive epidemiologists.Current epidemiology reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionIs there an association between air pollution exposures and the risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Higher exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution above and beyond a woman's average exposure may be associated with greater risk of SAB, particularly among women experiencing at least one SAB during follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is sufficient biologic plausibility to suggest that air pollution adversely affects early pregnancy outcomes, particularly pregnancy loss; however, the evidence is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our prospective cohort study included 19 309 women in the Nurses' Health Study II who contributed a total of 35 025 pregnancies between 1990 and 2008. We also conducted a case-crossover analysis among 3585 women (11 212 pregnancies) with at least one SAB and one live birth during follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsProximity to major roadways and exposure to PM <10 microns (PM10), 2.5-10 microns (PM2.5-10) and <2.5 microns (PM2.5) were determined for residential addresses between 1989 and 2007. Pregnancy outcomes were self-reported biannually throughout follow-up and comprehensively in 2009. Multivariable log-binomial regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the risk ratios and 95% CIs of SAB. Conditional logistic regression was used for the case-crossover analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: During the 19 years of follow-up, 6599 SABs (18.8% of pregnancies) were reported. In the main analysis, living closer to a major roadway and average exposure to PM10, PM10-2.5 or PM2.5 in the 1 or 2 years prior to pregnancy were not associated with an increased risk of SAB. However, small positive associations between PM exposures and SAB were observed when restricting the analysis to women experiencing at least one SAB during follow-up. In the case-crossover analysis, an increase in PM10 (per 3.9 μg/m3), PM2.5-10 (per 2.3 μg/m3) and PM2.5 (per 2.0 μg/m3) in the year prior to pregnancy was associated with 1.12 (95% CI 1.06, 1.19), 1.09 (95% CI 1.03, 1.14) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.04, 1.17) higher odds of SAB, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We did not have information on the month or day of SAB, which precluded our ability to examine specific windows of susceptibility or acute exposures. We also used ambient air pollution exposures as a proxy for personal exposure, potentially leading to exposure misclassification. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsIn our case-crossover analysis (but not in the entire cohort) we observed positive associations between exposure to all size fractions of PM exposure and risk of SAB. This may suggest that changes in PM exposure confer greater risk of SAB or that women with a history of SAB are a particularly vulnerable subgroup. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors are supported by the following NIH grants UM1CA176726, R00ES026648 and P30ES000002. The authors have no actual or potential competing financial interests to disclose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.