Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385588›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019

Air pollution exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion in the Nurses' Health Study II.

Audrey J Gaskins, Jaime E Hart, Jorge E Chavarro, Stacey A Missmer, Janet W Rich-Edwards, Francine Laden, Shruthi Mahalingaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Air pollution and pregnancy.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Maternal Exposure to PMCirculation · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Rural Areas of Henan, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Audrey J GaskinsDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jaime E HartChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jorge E ChavarroDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Janet W Rich-EdwardsChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Francine LadenChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shruthi MahalingaiahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Gary Adamkiewicz · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Life Course Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in WomenUM1CA176726 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2013 to 2017
$15.7M
Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Early Pregnancy OutcomesR00ES026648 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2019 to 2021
$730k
Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Early Pregnancy OutcomesK99ES026648 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2017 to 2018
$246k
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA176726NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES026648NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES026648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs there an association between air pollution exposures and the risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Higher exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution above and beyond a woman's average exposure may be associated with greater risk of SAB, particularly among women experiencing at least one SAB during follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is sufficient biologic plausibility to suggest that air pollution adversely affects early pregnancy outcomes, particularly pregnancy loss; however, the evidence is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our prospective cohort study included 19 309 women in the Nurses' Health Study II who contributed a total of 35 025 pregnancies between 1990 and 2008. We also conducted a case-crossover analysis among 3585 women (11 212 pregnancies) with at least one SAB and one live birth during follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsProximity to major roadways and exposure to PM <10 microns (PM10), 2.5-10 microns (PM2.5-10) and <2.5 microns (PM2.5) were determined for residential addresses between 1989 and 2007. Pregnancy outcomes were self-reported biannually throughout follow-up and comprehensively in 2009. Multivariable log-binomial regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the risk ratios and 95% CIs of SAB. Conditional logistic regression was used for the case-crossover analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: During the 19 years of follow-up, 6599 SABs (18.8% of pregnancies) were reported. In the main analysis, living closer to a major roadway and average exposure to PM10, PM10-2.5 or PM2.5 in the 1 or 2 years prior to pregnancy were not associated with an increased risk of SAB. However, small positive associations between PM exposures and SAB were observed when restricting the analysis to women experiencing at least one SAB during follow-up. In the case-crossover analysis, an increase in PM10 (per 3.9 μg/m3), PM2.5-10 (per 2.3 μg/m3) and PM2.5 (per 2.0 μg/m3) in the year prior to pregnancy was associated with 1.12 (95% CI 1.06, 1.19), 1.09 (95% CI 1.03, 1.14) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.04, 1.17) higher odds of SAB, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We did not have information on the month or day of SAB, which precluded our ability to examine specific windows of susceptibility or acute exposures. We also used ambient air pollution exposures as a proxy for personal exposure, potentially leading to exposure misclassification. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsIn our case-crossover analysis (but not in the entire cohort) we observed positive associations between exposure to all size fractions of PM exposure and risk of SAB. This may suggest that changes in PM exposure confer greater risk of SAB or that women with a history of SAB are a particularly vulnerable subgroup. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors are supported by the following NIH grants UM1CA176726, R00ES026648 and P30ES000002. The authors have no actual or potential competing financial interests to disclose.

Indexed as

NursesAbortion, SpontaneousAdultAir PollutantsAir PollutionCross-Over StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedParticulate MatterPregnancyProspective StudiesSelf ReportUnited StatesAir PollutantsParticulate Matterair pollutionenvironmentmiscarriageparticulate matterpregnancy lossspontaneous abortion

Identifiers

PMID31385588
PMCPMC6736292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.