ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
Clinical Significance of Serum Chemokines in Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Multi-Omics and Pan-Cancer Analyses Identify CCL20 as a Prognostic Biomarker with Therapeutic Relevance in Esophageal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Activation of the tumor cell-intrinsic STING pathway induced by Fusobacterium nucleatum is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025Article
- Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with thalidomide and S-1 for esophageal carcinoma and its influence on serum tumor markers.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Oral Microbiota Variation: A Risk Factor for Development and Poor Prognosis of Esophageal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Salivary cytokine profile in patients with oral lichen planus.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of the role of CXC ligands in the microenvironment of head and neck tumor.Aging · 2021Article
- Cytokine-chemokine network driven metastasis in esophageal cancer; promising avenue for targeted therapy.Molecular cancer · 2021Review
- Linking Circulating Serum Proteins with Clinical Outcomes in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-An Emerging Role for Chemokines.Cancers · 2020Article
- Identification of an Autophagy-Related Prognostic Signature for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- High serum CCL20 is associated with tumor progression in penile cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to detect the expression levels of chemokines (CX3CL1, CXCL-11, CXCL-12, CCL3, CCL4, and CCL20) in the serum of esophageal cancer patients and a normal control group, and to explore the correlations of those expression levels with the pathological type, progression, and metastasis of esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 50 normal people and 50 untreated patients initially diagnosed with esophageal cancer (including 17 cases of non-metastatic esophageal cancer, 33 cases of metastatic esophageal cancer, 36 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 14 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma) were collected. The liquid chip (Luminex) technology was applied to detect the expression levels of the above-mentioned serum chemokines in the two groups. The results were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solution 20.0 software. RESULTS The expression levels of CX3CL1, CXCL-12, and CCL20 in esophageal cancer group were evidently higher than those in normal control group (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in chemokine expressions between metastatic esophageal cancer group and non-metastatic esophageal cancer group (P>0.05). The expression level of serum CCL4 in esophageal adenocarcinoma group was remarkably higher than that in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma group [18.45 (11.94) versus 13.37 (9.29), Z=-2.039, P=0.031]. In esophageal cancer group and normal control group, the serum CX3CL1 was positively correlated with CCL20 (r=0.649, P<0.001, r=0.758, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The expressions of serum CX3CL1, CXCL-12, and CCL20 are increased markedly in the patients, which may promote the occurrence, development and metastasis of esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.