Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385489›Full record

Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2019

Efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic fields on pain, disability, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with cervical disc herniation: a randomized controlled study

Erkam Hattapoğlu, İbrahim Batmaz, Banu Dilek, Mehmet Karakoç, Serda Em, Remzi Çevik

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05581186 (Efficacy of Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05581186 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsNeck Pain, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Chronic Neck Pain, Cervical Disc DiseaseArmsPulse electromagnetic field therapy, Sham pulse electromagnetic field therapy, Therapeutic Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Reduces Neuropathic Pain in Mice.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erkam HattapoğluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4834-852X
İbrahim BatmazDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6595-5762
Banu DilekDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-5451-0757
Mehmet KarakoçDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9511-7070
Serda EmDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6162-849X
Remzi ÇevikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4124-1586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects ofpulsed electromagnetic field(PEMF) therapy on pain, disability, psychological state, and quality of life in cervical disc herniation. Materials and methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups, including Group 1, which received a therapy consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hot pack (HP), and PEMF, and Group 2, which received a magnetic field (sham magnetic field) without current flow in addition to TENS and HP therapy. Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10 cm). The other outcome measures were function (Neck Pain and Disability Scale), anxiety-depressive mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile). All evaluations were performed at baseline, in the 3rd week, and in the 12th week after treatment. Results: A significant improvement was found in the neck pain, disability, depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores of both groups after treatment when compared to those before treatment. However, in the comparison between changes within groups, significant improvements were determined only in the VAS and Nottingham Health Profile sleep subparameter in the 12th week after treatment compared to those before treatment. Conclusion: PEMF therapy in cervical disc herniation can be used safely in routine treatment in addition to conventional physical therapy modalities.

Indexed as

Back PainDepressionIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementMagnetic Field TherapyQuality of LifeAdultCervical VertebraeDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomecervical disc herniationpainPulsed electromagnetic fieldsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID31385489
PMCPMC7018371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.