ReviewTurkish journal of medical sciences2019
Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders
Review in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of dehydroepiandrosterone priming in women with poor ovarian response undergoing IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Pooled it
- A Comparative Study of the Effect of Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG With Dual Trigger in Poor Responder Poseidon Group 4 Patients in Antagonist IVF Cycles.Advanced biomedical research · 2026Article
- Ultra-low-dose and very-low-dose Lupron downregulation protocols for poor responders based on POSEIDON group 3 and 4 classifications.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Assisted reproductive technology and interactions between serum basal FSH/LH and ovarian sensitivity index.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Article
- Improving Reporting of Clinical Studies Using the POSEIDON Criteria: POSORT Guidelines.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Predictive Factors for Live Birth in FreshFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of a Clinical Pregnancy Failure Prediction Model for Poor Ovarian Responders During IVF/ICSI.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Alterations in follicular fluid BMP-15 RNA expression in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulationTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- What is the effect of the early follicular phase FSH/LH ratio on the number of mature oocytes and embryo development?Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Mitochondrial enrichment in infertile patients: a review of different mitochondrial replacement therapies.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: In a group of IVF/ICSI cycles, despite the appropriate ovarian stimulation, the number of oocytes collected is below the expected value. This condition is defined as poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation. POR brings the risk of cycle cancellation with an estimated rate of 20%. Infertility experts are trying to improve cycle outcomes of POR cases with multiple modifications. This review article will present the latest modifications on the management of POR. The studies performed for improving cycle outcome in POR cases were evaluated and their notable results were presented. The first intervention among infertility specialists is to make a standard definition for POR. The BOLOGNA criteria and the subsequent POSEIDON group definitions are the latest updates in POR management. GnRH antagonists, estradiol priming, double stimulation, letrozole administration, DHEA, and herbal therapy supplementations are the recent modifications done to improve oocyte retrieval and subsequent embryo transfer for POR cases. This review article presents the encouraging methods applied for POR cases to improve cycle outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.