ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2020
Variation in target volume and centroid position due to breath holding during four-dimensional computed tomography scanning: A phantom study.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4D CT acquisition methods and their anticipated effects on image quality in dynamic CT-scanning of the wrist.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Margins to compensate for respiratory-induced mismatches between lung tumor and fiducial marker positions using four-dimensional computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Technical Note: Volumetric computed tomography for radiotherapy simulation and treatment planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of respiratory motion, including unwanted breath holding, on the target volume and centroid position on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging. Cine 4DCT images were reconstructed based on a time-based sorting algorithm, and helical 4DCT images were reconstructed based on both the time-based sorting algorithm and an amplitude-based sorting algorithm. A spherical object 20 mm in diameter was moved according to several simulated respiratory motions, with a motion period of 4.0 s and maximum amplitude of 5 mm. The object was extracted automatically, and the target volume and centroid position in the craniocaudal direction were measured using a treatment planning system. When the respiratory motion included unwanted breath-holding times shorter than the breathing cycle, the root mean square errors (RSME) between the reference and imaged target volumes were 18.8%, 14.0%, and 5.5% in time-based images in cine mode, time-based images in helical mode, and amplitude-based images in helical mode, respectively. In helical mode, the RSME between the reference and imaged centroid position was reduced from 1.42 to 0.50 mm by changing the reconstruction method from time- to amplitude-based sorting. When the respiratory motion included unwanted breath-holding times equal to the breathing cycle, the RSME between the reference and imaged target volumes were 19.1%, 24.3%, and 15.6% in time-based images in cine mode, time-based images in helical mode, and amplitude-based images in helical mode, respectively. In helical mode, the RSME between the reference and imaged centroid position was reduced from 1.61 to 0.83 mm by changing the reconstruction method from time- to amplitude-based sorting. With respiratory motion including breath holding of shorter duration than the breathing cycle, the accuracies of the target volume and centroid position were improved by amplitude-based sorting, particularly in helical 4DCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.