Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385354›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2019

How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis.

Hannah Rayment-Jones, James Harris, Angela Harden, Zahra Khan, Jane Sandall

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Ethnicity and Migration in Perinatal Inequalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah Rayment-JonesDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Science, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, North Wing St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-8025
James HarrisElizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Angela HardenInstitute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK.
Zahra KhanFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Science, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, North Wing St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2017-10-033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEchoing international trends, the most recent United Kingdom reports of infant and maternal mortality found that pregnancies to women with social risk factors are over 50% more likely to end in stillbirth or neonatal death and carry an increased risk of premature birth and maternal death. The aim of this realist synthesis was to uncover the mechanisms that affect women's experiences of maternity care.

methodsUsing realist methodology, 22 papers exploring how women with a wide range of social risk factors experience maternity care in the United Kingdom were included. The data extraction process identified contexts (C), mechanisms (M), and outcomes (0).

resultsThree themes, Resources, Relationships, and Candidacy, overarched eight CMO configurations. Access to services, appropriate education, interpreters, practical support, and continuity of care were particularly relevant for women who are unfamiliar with the United Kingdom system and those living chaotic lives. For women with experience of trauma, or those who lack a sense of control, a trusting relationship with a health care professional was key to regaining trust. Many women who have social care involvement during their pregnancy perceive health care services as a system of surveillance rather than support, impacting on their engagement. This, as well as experiences of paternalistic care and discrimination, could be mitigated through the ability to develop trusting relationships.

conclusionsThe findings provide underlying theory and practical guidance on how to develop safe services that aim to reduce inequalities in women's experiences and birth outcomes.

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathSocial IsolationFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesParentsPostnatal CarePregnancyProfessional-Family RelationsQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsStillbirthUnited Kingdomexperiences of carematernity servicessocioeconomic status and ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID31385354
PMCPMC6771833
OpenAlexW2964593933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.