ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021
Equilibrium radionuclide angiography: Intra- and inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility in the assessment of cardiac systolic and diastolic function.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left-sided mastectomy mimics LVEF decline on CZT-ERNA: a consideration for cardio-oncology practice.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Tales from the future-nuclear cardio-oncology, from prediction to diagnosis and monitoring.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Review
- Nuclear medicine in the assessment and prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity: prospects and proposal of use by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Shining Damaged Hearts: Immunotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity in the Spotlight of Nuclear Cardiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Equilibrium radionuclide angiography: Present and future.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement in assessing the systolic and diastolic function with equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA). MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-two adults underwent baseline and repeat ERNA. An experienced and a trainee operator analyzed the data by assigning regions of interest manually, fully automatically, and semi-automatically. The Bland-Altman statistic (mean ± 1.96 standard deviations of the differences) was used to assess the repeatability (two different assessments of a single acquisition) and reproducibility (assessments of two different acquisitions).
resultsUsing the semi-automated technique the intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction for the experienced physician were - 0.1 ± 3.7 and 0.0 ± 3.8 and for the trainee 2.2 ± 10.6 and 1.9 ± 8.4, respectively. The inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility were - 1.8 ± 6.4 and 0.4 ± 9.0, respectively. Among the parameters of diastolic function, the intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility of the peak filling rate for the experienced physician were - 0.0 ± 1.1 and - 0.1 ± 1.1 and for the trainee 0.2 ± 3.5 and 0.4 ± 3.7, respectively. The inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility were 0.3 ± 1.5 and 0.5 ± 4.0, respectively. Similar was the pattern for the other diastolic indices. In all cases the limits of agreement varied according to the quantification approach.
conclusionA good repeatability but a moderate reproducibility was found in the assessment of the LVEF. Less good were the findings in the assessment of diastolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31385225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.