Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385186›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2020

Examining Breast Cancer Screening Behavior Among Southern Black Women After the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guideline Revisions.

Deeonna E Farr, Heather M Brandt, Swann Arp Adams, Venice E Haynes, Andrea S Gibson, Dawnyéa D Jackson, Kimberly C Rawlinson, John R Ureda, James R Hébert

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Linking Structural Racism and Discrimination and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Social Genomics Approach.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deeonna E FarrDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, 2307 Carol G. Belk Building, Mail Stop 529, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. farrd17@ecu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-8137
Heather M BrandtSouth Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Swann Arp AdamsSouth Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Venice E HaynesSouth Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Andrea S GibsonSouth Carolina Office of Rural Health, 107 Saluda Pointe Drive, Lexington, SC, 29072, USA.
Dawnyéa D JacksonResearch Department, Rescue | The Behavior Change Agency, 660 Pennsylvania Ave. SE, Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20003, USA.
Kimberly C RawlinsonCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
John R UredaInsights Consulting, Inc, 2728 Wilmot Avenue, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA.
James R HébertSouth Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
University of South Carolina · USClinical Insights · USEast Carolina University · USSouth Carolina Department of Education · US

Funding

Training ProgramU54CA153461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community NetworksU01CA114601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2005 to 2010
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114601NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and American Cancer Society mammography screening recommendations push for increased age of initiation and lengthened breast cancer screening intervals. These changes have implications for the reduction of breast cancer mortality in Black women. The purpose of this study was to examine breast cancer screening behavior in a cohort of Southern Black women after the release of the 2009 USPSTF recommendations. Surveys assessing cancer screening information were collected from members of Black churches between 2006 and 2013. The sample was restricted to women aged 40 to 74 years, who did not report a breast cancer diagnosis, or a recent diagnostic mammogram (n = 789). Percentages of women ever completing a mammogram (age 40-49) and annual mammography (age 50-74) in 2006-2009 and 2010-2013 were compared using chi-square statistics. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the predictors of adherence to pre-2010 screening guidelines. No significant changes in mammography rates were found for women in the 40-49 age group (X

Indexed as

MammographyAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicUnited StatesAfrican AmericansBreast neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerGuideline adherenceMammography

Identifiers

PMID31385186
PMCPMC6957709
OpenAlexW2965996137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.