Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Clinical profile of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: a multicentre propensity score matched real-world cohort study.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03760874 (Prospective Register Study to Record Safety and Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Register Study to Record Safety and Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Cerebrovascular Ischemic Outcomes in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Octogenarians Across the Renal Function Spectrum.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Observational
- Clinical profile and outcomes in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation anticoagulated with rivaroxaban: data from the EMIR study.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Andexanet alfa for oral fxa inhibitor-associated major acute intracerebral hemorrhage: insights into clinically relevant thromboembolic events from the ANNEXA-I study.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2024Article
- Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Effects of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Malignancy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Antioxidant Properties of Oral Antithrombotic Therapies in Atherosclerotic Disease and Atrial Fibrillation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical impact of high platelet reactivity in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention on dual or triple antithrombotic therapy.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Observational
- Clinical impact of oral anticoagulation among octogenarians with atrial fibrillation and anaemia.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Special Populations: Beyond the Clinical Trials.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Retrospective Comparison of Patients ≥ 80 Years With Atrial Fibrillation Prescribed Either an FDA-Approved Reduced or Full Dose Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Clinical Performance of Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation and Low Body Weight: Insight into Italian Cohort of PREFER-AF and PREFER-AF Prolongation Registries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical features and outcomes of patients in different age groups with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Prevalence and clinical predictors of inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosage in octagenarians with atrial fibrillation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Oral anticoagulation patterns and prognosis in octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Octogenarians with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Nursing Teleconsultation for the Outpatient Management of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease during COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Stroke, Dementia, and Atrial Fibrillation: From Pathophysiologic Association to Pharmacological Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Risk of major bleeding in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation on direct oral anticoagulants: real world experience.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and its prevalence increases with age. Few data are available about the clinical performance of direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) in patients aged ≥ 80 years with AF. The aim of our propensity score matched cohort study was to compare the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus well-controlled VKA therapy among octogenarians with AF in real life setting. Data for this study were sourced from the multicenter prospectively maintained Atrial Fibrillation Research Database (NCT03760874), which includes all AF patients followed by the participating centers, through outpatient visits every 3 to 6 months. The database was queried for AF patients aged ≥ 80 years who received DOACs or VKAs treatment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the occurrence of thromboembolic events (a composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism); the primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleeding; the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The database query identified 774 AF patients aged ≥ 80 years treated with VKAs and 279 with DOACs. Propensity score (2:1) matching selected 252 DOAC and 504 VKA recipients. The mean follow-up was 31.07 ± 14.09 months. The incidence rate of thromboembolic events was 13.79 per 1000 person-years [14.80 in DOAC vs 13.34 in VKA group, Hazard Ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 2.45; P = 0.823]. The incidence rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was 8.06 per 1000 person-years (3.25 in DOAC vs 10.23 in VKA group, HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.07 to 1.45; P = 0.600). Through these incidence rates, we found a positive net clinical benefit (NCB) of DOACs over VKAs, equal to + 9.01. The incidence rate of all-cause mortality was 105.05 per 1000 person-years (74.67 in DOAC vs 118.67 in VKA group, Hazard Ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90; P = 0.010). The concomitant use of antiinflammatory drugs (HR 7.90; P < 0.001) were found to be independent predictor of major bleeding. Moreover, age (HR 1.17; P < 0.002) and chronic kidney disease (HR 0.34; P = 0.019) were found to be independently associated with thromboembolic events. In our study no significant difference in terms of both thromboembolic and major bleeding events, but a significant lower incidence of all-cause mortality, was detected in AF patients aged ≥ 80 years treated with DOACs vs VKAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.