ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2020
Correction to: Which Methodological Practice(s) for Psychotherapy Science? A Systematic Review and a Proposal.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relational skills and self-awareness outcomes in psychotherapy trainees.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2026Article
- The strategic distraction motive: addiction as attentional regulation under perceived insolubility.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Psychotherapy for complex post-traumatic stress disorder: efficacy and therapeutic factors.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Specific and common therapeutic factors in psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and adolescents: an overview.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- The Therapeutic Relationship in Videoconferencing Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Study of Therapists' Experiences.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2024Article
- The Role of Safety in Change-Promoting Therapeutic Relationships: An Integrative Relational Approach.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We would like to note the following corrections to the original version of Zhang, Sun, Lin and Ren.
Identifiers
31385162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.