Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385108›Full record

ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2020

Orthostatic heart rate does not predict symptomatic burden in pediatric patients with chronic orthostatic intolerance.

Jeffrey R Boris, Jing Huang, Thomas Bernadzikowski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association between symptoms of pediatric postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and joint hypermobility syndromes.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How should we measure the "POT" of POTS, and how much does it matter?Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Poor health-related quality of life in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in comparison with a sex- and age-matched normative population.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cardiovascular Autonomic Regulation, ETCOApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "Dysautonomia": a plea for precision.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R Boris, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0428-7681
Jing HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas BernadzikowskiDivision of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. bernadzikt@email.chop.edu.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPhiladelphia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) in adults is defined as symptoms of chronic orthostatic intolerance (COI) and autonomic dysfunction (AD) with heart rate (HR) increase of 30 beats per minute (bpm), or HR > 120 bpm, during prolonged upright position. However, in adolescents, POTS is defined as symptoms of OI and AD with HR increase of ≥ 40 bpm, based on tilt table data. We assessed frequency of COI symptoms in pediatric patients versus HR criteria on prolonged standing to evaluate using criteria of increased HR of 30-39 bpm versus ≥ 40 bpm in our POTS Program.

methodsPatients with COI with symptoms for > 3 months plus HR increase of ≥ 30 bpm on 10 min stand aged ≤ 18 years at diagnosis were included. Patients were divided into two groups: those with HR increase of 30-39 bpm, and those with HR increase of ≥ 40 bpm or upright HR of > 120 bpm. A total of 28 symptoms described prior to diagnosis were evaluated using chi-square testing to assess for significant differences.

resultsOnly insomnia was found to be significantly different between the two groups. The other 27 symptoms showed no significant difference as a function of HR.

conclusionThere are minimal statistically significant differences and no clinical differences between patients as a function of HR increase during standing. Thus, a 40-bpm threshold for adolescents on standing test may be too high, or a specific HR criteria threshold is neither predictive nor definitive in diagnosing POTS.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdolescentChildFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleOrthostatic IntolerancePostural Orthostatic Tachycardia SyndromePosturePredictive Value of TestsAdolescentDiagnosisDysautonomiaPostural tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID31385108
OpenAlexW2966383945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.