Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385029›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Modulation of intracortical inhibition and excitation in agonist and antagonist muscles following acute strength training.

Joel Mason, Glyn Howatson, Ashlyn K Frazer, Alan J Pearce, Shapour Jaberzadeh, Janne Avela, Dawson J Kidgell

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joel MasonDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Glyn HowatsonFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Ashlyn K FrazerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Alan J PearceSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shapour JaberzadehDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Janne AvelaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Neuromuscular Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Dawson J KidgellDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia. dawson.kidgell@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-1298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) usually investigates the corticospinal responses of the agonist muscle to strength training, despite the role of the antagonist muscle in strength development. We examined the intracortical responses from an agonist and antagonist muscle following a single session of heavy-loaded strength training (dominant-arm only) to identify the early antagonistic responses to a single session that may accompany improvements in strength.

methodsCorticospinal and motor cortical excitability and inhibition was collected from agonist and antagonist muscles prior to and following a single session of heavy-loaded wrist flexor training in 18 individuals. Training consisted of four sets 6-8 repetitions at 80% of 1-repetition maximum (1-RM). Recruitment curves for corticospinal excitability and inhibition of the right wrist flexor and wrist extensor muscles were constructed and assessed by examining the area under the recruitment curve. Intracortical measures were obtained using paired-pulse TMS.

resultsFollowing a single training session, increases in corticospinal excitability were observed in both the agonist and antagonist muscles. This was accompanied by decreases in corticospinal inhibition in both muscles. Intracortical inhibition was reduced and intracortical facilitation was increased for the agonist muscle only. Intracortical measures in the antagonist muscle remained unchanged after training.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that the corticospinal responses to a single session of strength training are similar between agonist and antagonist muscles, but the intrinsic cortico-cortical circuitry of the antagonist remains unchanged. The corticospinal responses are likely due to increased involvement/co-activation of the antagonist muscle during training as the agonist muscle fatigues.

Indexed as

Cortical ExcitabilityNeural InhibitionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Conditioning, HumanPyramidal TractsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgonistAntagonistCorticospinal excitabilityCorticospinal silent periodIntracortical facilitationShort-interval cortical inhibitionStrength training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.