Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31385010›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

MR defecography technique: recommendations of the society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel on pelvic floor imaging.

Neeraj Lalwani, Gaurav Khatri, Rania Farouk El Sayed, Roopa Ram, Kedar Jambhekar, Victoria Chernyak, Amita Kamath, Sara Lewis, Milana Flusberg, Francis Scholz and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiology of lower gastrointestinal tract.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. [Radiological imaging following pelvic prolapse surgery].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Functional MRI of the pelvic floor].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  14. X-ray video defaecography is superior to magnetic resonance defaecography in the imaging of defaecation disorders.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?Japanese journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Neeraj LalwaniWake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. nlalwani@wakehealth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-2805
Gaurav KhatriDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Rania Farouk El SayedDepartment of Radiology, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
Roopa RamUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Kedar JambhekarUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Victoria ChernyakAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, NY, USA.
Amita KamathIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sara LewisIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Milana FlusbergDepartment of Radiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Francis ScholzTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Hina Arif-TiwariDepartment of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Suzanne L PalmerDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mark E LockhartDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Julia R FieldingDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop recommendations for magnetic resonance (MR) defecography technique based on consensus of expert radiologists on the disease-focused panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR).

methodsAn extensive questionnaire was sent to a group of 20 experts from the disease-focused panel of the SAR. The questionnaire encompassed details of technique and MRI protocol used for evaluating pelvic floor disorders. 75% agreement on questionnaire responses was defined as consensus.

resultsThe expert panel reached consensus for 70% of the items and provided the basis of these recommendations for MR defecography technique. There was unanimous agreement that patients should receive coaching and explanation of commands used during MR defecography, the rectum should be distended with contrast agent, and that sagittal T2-weighted images should include the entire pelvis within the field of view. The panel also agreed unanimously that IV contrast should not be used for MR defecography. Additional areas of consensus ranged in agreement from 75 to 92%.

conclusionWe provide a set of consensus recommendations for MR defecography technique based on a survey of expert radiologists in the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel. These recommendations can be used to develop a standardized imaging protocol.

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersRadiologyDefecographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPelvic FloorDisease-focused panelMagnetic resonance defecographyPelvic floor imagingRecommendations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.