Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31384993›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Surgical treatment of esophagotracheal and esophagobronchial fistulas].

C Mann, T J Musholt, B Babic, M Hürtgen, I Gockel, F Thieringer, H Lang, P P Grimminger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Esophagotracheal and esophagobronchial fistulas].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C MannKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
T J MusholtKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
B BabicKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
M HürtgenKlinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz-Montabaur, Koblenz, Deutschland.
I GockelKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland.
F ThieringerI. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
H LangKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. hauke.lang@unimedizin-mainz.de.
P P GrimmingerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagotracheal and esophagobronchial fistulas are pathological communications between the airway system and the digestive tract, which often lead to major pulmonary complications with a high mortality. Endoscopic treatment is the primary therapeutic approach; however, in cases of failure early surgical treatment is obligatory.

methodsThis article describes the clinical course of patients with esophagotracheal and esophagobronchial fistulas treated in this hospital over a period of 10 years. Patients were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the etiology of fistulas, management, in particular to the operative procedures, complications and outcome.

resultsBetween 2009 and 2019, a total of 15 patients with esophagotracheal and esophagobronchial fistula were treated in this hospital. Of these 12 underwent an endoscopic intervention, of which 5 were successful. In total, eight patients needed surgical intervention, six of the eight surgically treated patients recovered fully, one had a recurrent fistula, which was successfully treated by subsequent endoscopy after surgery and one patient died. DISCUSSION: Management of esophagotracheal and esophagobronchial fistulas is challenging. This retrospective analysis reflects the published data with a success rate of endoscopic treatment in approximately 50%. Surgical intervention should be carried out after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment or if endoscopic treatment is primarily not feasible. Direct closure with resorbable sutures or reconstruction with alloplastic or allogeneic material should be preferred. For larger defects or high proximal esophagotracheal fistulas local transposition of muscular flaps or free muscular flaps play a major role. During operative closure of high intrathoracic or cervical fistulas, intraoperative neuromonitoring can be useful to prevent nerve damage.

Indexed as

Bronchial FistulaEsophageal FistulaHumansRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeComplication managementEsophagectomyFree tissue flapNeuromonitoringPedicled flap

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.