Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31384701›Full record

ArticleAIMS microbiology2019

Application of EvaGreen for the assessment of

Elena Kotenkova, Dagmara Bataeva, Mikhail Minaev, Elena Zaiko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIMS microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena KotenkovaV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, 109316, Talalikhina St., 26, Moscow, Russia.
Dagmara BataevaV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, 109316, Talalikhina St., 26, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail MinaevV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, 109316, Talalikhina St., 26, Moscow, Russia.
Elena ZaikoV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, 109316, Talalikhina St., 26, Moscow, Russia.
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Refrigeration Industry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of eukaryotic cell viability using flow cytometry is widespread and based on the use of fluorescent dyes such as SYTO, DAPI, SYBR, PI, and SYTOX. For many years, traditional microbiological methods have been used to successfully analyze prokaryotic cells, but the application of flow cytometry should be considered because it provides an opportunity for quantitative assessment. A combination of SYTO 9 or SYBR green and PI has been used successfully. DNA-binding dyes such as SYTO 9, SYBR green, and EvaGreen are used in qPCR. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of EvaGreen to determine the viability of

Indexed as

EvaGreenflow cytometryListeria monocytogenesviability

Identifiers

PMID31384701
PMCPMC6646934
OpenAlexW2912862510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.