ReviewProstate international2019
Biological principles and clinical application of positron emission tomography-tracers in prostate cancer: a review.
Review in Prostate international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- PSMA-based theranostics in diagnosing and treating prostate cancer in the Asian male population: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Potential of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Precision Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer: A Radiopharmaceutical Perspective.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate carcinoma is the most common malignancy in men and the second cause of death by cancer in the western world. Currently, prostate carcinoma's diagnosis is achieved by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (gold-standard), usually requested after an elevation of prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels or an abnormal digital rectal exam or transrectal ultrasound. Nevertheless, this diagnosis sequence sometimes presents with significant limitations. Therefore, there is a need of a diagnosis modality that improves the tumor detection rates and that offers information for its accurate staging, allowing the treatment's planning and administration. Molecular imaging by the means of positron emission tomography uses radiopharmaceuticals labeled with positron-emitting radioisotopes to detect metabolic changes that might be suggestive of cancer tissue. Recently, this technique has suffered a huge dynamic development, and researchers have been working on novel radiotracers agents to improve accuracy in targeting and detecting prostate tumors. On this review, it is highlighted that the most promising positron emission tomography-tracers that will, in a near future, not only improve diagnostic abilities for prostate carcinoma but also open new possibilities for theranostic approaches to treat this malignancy at a world level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.