ReviewAsia Pacific allergy2019
Human leukocyte antigen-associated severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: from bedside to bench and beyond.
Review in Asia Pacific allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenomics in epilepsy care across Asia.Epilepsia · 2026Review
- Targeted adaptive sampling enables clinical pharmacogenomics testing and genome-wide genotyping.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Drug-Induced Serious Cutaneous Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Role of pharmacogenomics for prevention of hypersensitivity reactions induced by aromatic antiseizure medications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Characteristics of adverse drug reactions due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a cross-sectional study.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Causes of Drug-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction Epidermal Necrolysis (EN): An Analysis Using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Article
- Chronic ocular sequelae in Stevens-Johnson syndrome: a genetic association study.Molecular vision · 2022Article
- Current Perspectives on Severe Drug Eruption.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021Review
- Genetic Markers for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in the Asian Indian Population: Implications on Prevention.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Actions needed for "Allergy in Asia-Pacific".Asia Pacific allergy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their being uncommon, severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) result in a very great burden of disease. These reactions not only carry with them a high mortality (10%-50%) and high morbidity (60%) with severe ocular complications, alopecia, oral and dental complications and development of autoimmune diseases, but also create a substantial economic burden for patients' families and society. SCARs are, therefore, an important medical problem needing a solution in many countries, especially in Asia. The clinical spectrum of SCARs comprises Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, DRESS (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) (also known as drug hypersensitivity syndrome or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome) and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis. Recent crucial advances in determining genetic susceptibility and understanding how T cells recognise certain medications or their metabolites via the major histocompatibility complex and the effects of cofactors, have led to the implementation of cost-effective screening programs enabling prevention in a number of countries, and to further understanding of the patho-mechanisms involved in SCARs and their significance. In this review, we document comprehensively the journey of SCARs from bedside to bench and outline future perspectives in SCARs research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.