Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31384374›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery.

Silvana Molossi, Luis E Martínez-Bravo, Carlos M Mery

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Myocardial perfusion imaging in anomalous coronary arteries: do we know who to refer for cardiac surgery?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana MolossiTEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, HOUSTON, TEXAS.
Luis E Martínez-BravoESCUELA DE MEDICINA, TECNOLOGICO DE MONTERREY, MONTERREY, MEXICO.
Carlos M MeryTEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, HOUSTON, TEXAS.
Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes. The pathophysiology leading to sudden cardiac death, the specific risks associated with the different varieties of AAOCA, and the effects of different management strategies on the risk of sudden cardiac death are all unknown. This article describes the current knowledge of AAOCA, a proposed nomenclature for the different anatomic subtypes, the different modalities used to diagnose and characterize the disease, the available management strategies, and an algorithm used by the authors to diagnose and manage these patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesAlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingCoronary Vessel AnomaliesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDecision Support TechniquesHumansPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAAOCAanomalous aortic origin of a coronary arterycoronary anomalysudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID31384374
PMCPMC6668744
OpenAlexW2972118748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.