Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31384307›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2019

Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: from guidelines to real life.

Lucian Negreanu, Theodor Voiosu, Monica State, Andrei Voiosu, Andreea Bengus, Bogdan Radu Mateescu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Imaging Agents for PET of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cannabinoids and Inflammations of the Gut-Lung-Skin Barrier.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Artificial Intelligence Enhances Studies on Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucian NegreanuUniversity Hospital Bucharest, Gastroenterology Department, Splaiul Independentei Nr. 169, Sector 5, Bucharest, Bucuresti, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-0754
Theodor VoiosuColentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania.
Monica StateColentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania.
Andrei VoiosuColentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania.
Andreea BengusColentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania.
Bogdan Radu MateescuColentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopy has a central role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), providing crucial data for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, treating disease-related complications, and assisting in the early detection of dysplasia and prevention of colorectal cancer in the setting of IBD. Treatment targets have significantly shifted in IBD, focusing on achieving mucosal healing, a more meaningful endpoint than clinical remission. With the emergence of novel therapies, we aim to alter the course of the disease and prevent irreversible damage to the bowel. To that end, obtaining reliable and reproducible assessments of endoscopic disease activity has become an issue of great importance. Although several guidelines include recommendations regarding endoscopic surveillance in patients with long-standing IBD, there is an open debate regarding the best examination method and the appropriate follow-up intervals. Another important issue is whether surveillance guidelines are actually implemented in real-life practice and what is the preferred surveillance method among endoscopists. Significant changes have occurred in the endoscopic world with the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities and their incorporation in everyday practice. We aimed to assess the real-life application of guideline recommendations regarding endoscopy in IBD patients and to review newly emerged data which might impact these recommendations in the near future.

Indexed as

colon cancer surveillanceendoscopyinflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID31384307
PMCPMC6657117
OpenAlexW2962864120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.