ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2019
Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor social support is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. Maternity group homes (MGHs), residential programs for pregnant women, have been found to improve social support in small studies. The present study aimed to verify these previous studies, discover whether there is a group of women whom MGHs most benefit, identify what services offer that benefit, and identify how to predict who will most benefit from MGH admission. Forty-three US MGHs from 14 states were surveyed from August 2015 to February 2017. The primary outcome was self-reported social support before and during MGH admission. The secondary outcome was the perception that MGH admission would help current and future relationships. Among 95 respondents, 54% perceived better in-MGH support compared to pre-MGH support. Women with poor pre-MGH support reported improvement; the converse was true of high pre-MGH support (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.