Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31383990›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2020

Novel approaches and new grafting materials in Peyronie's disease reconstructive surgery.

Georgios Hatzichristodoulou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Current treatment concepts for Peyronie's disease].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgios HatzichristodoulouDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. hatzichris_g@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-7362
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the current literature that reports outcomes of Peyronie's disease (PD) grafting surgery, with a special focus on novel approaches and grafting materials. For this purpose, a literature review was performed through PubMed between 2014 and 2019 regarding grafting techniques in PD reconstructive surgery. Keywords used for the search were: Peyronie's disease, penile curvature, surgical therapy, surgical outcomes, grafting techniques, grafts, and graft materials. Outcomes discussed in this review include post-operative penile straightening rates, penile shortening, erectile function, sensation at the glans penis, and patient satisfaction rates. There are several techniques and grafts available that can be used to close the tunical defect after partial plaque excision or plaque incision. Autologous and non-autologous grafts have been investigated for this purpose. Currently, non-autologous off-the-shelf grafts are being used predominantly because of some advantages that include: no harvesting from the patient's body, ready availability, decreased operative times, easy handling, and reduced morbidity. Patients scheduled for grafting surgery do need to have sufficient and documented erectile rigidity preoperatively. Moreover, realistic expectations should be set before surgery. By meeting these requirements, patients can expect good and satisfactory surgical outcomes. The most important predictors of success in PD grafting surgery still remain surgeon experience and careful patient selection.

Indexed as

Penile ProsthesisErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePatient SatisfactionPenile ErectionPenile IndurationPenisPlastic Surgery ProceduresPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID31383990
OpenAlexW2965506401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.