ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2020
Older Australians are eating more protein: Secondary analysis of the 1995 & 2011/12 national nutrition surveys.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal patterns of total, animal and plant protein intakes of Australian adults: a latent class analysis.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Prospective associations of protein intake parameters with muscle strength and physical performance in community-dwelling older men and women from the Quebec NuAge cohort.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Article
- Association of adherence to the Australian Dietary Guidelines with cognitive performance and cognitive decline in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study: a longitudinal analysis.Journal of nutritional science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDiet is important in healthy ageing. Protein is essential for physical function, immunity, maintaining quality of life and ability to live independently. SUBJECTS/
methodsProtein intakes, sources and the protein content of meals and snacks among adults aged ≥65 years from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey (n = 1960) and the 2011/12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 2103) were examined. Usual protein intakes were estimated using the National Cancer Institute method, and intakes and adequacy were compared between the two surveys.
resultsParticipants reported a higher total protein intake in 2011/12 than 1995 (81.0 vs. 73.4 g, p < 0.001). Mean protein intake per kg body weight (1995, 1.0 g/kg vs. 2011/12, 1.1 g/kg) and ability to meet the Australian (1995, 85% vs. 2011/12, 88%) and World Health Organisation (1995, 90% vs. 2011/12, 94%) protein requirements increased over time. Males >70 years or those with poor self-assessed health status were more likely to report inadequate protein intake compared with other respondents. Higher protein intake was associated with greater consumption of vegetables, fruit, dairy products, meat and alternatives and lower consumption of discretionary foods and alcohol. Participants obtained 17% of their protein intake from breakfast, 30% from lunch, 43% from dinner and 10% from snacks. Main protein sources included lean red meat, poultry and full cream milk.
conclusionSpecific dietary advice for older Australians, particularly older men and those with poor health, to promote healthy food choices with adequate protein content is needed for disease prevention and maintenance of quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.