Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31383876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Constraints to counting bioluminescence producing cells by a commonly used transgene promoter and its implications for experimental design.

E O Mosaad, K Futrega, I Seim, B Gloss, K F Chambers, J A Clements, M R Doran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Non-radioactive imaging strategies forPhysical sciences reviews · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

E O MosaadSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
K FutregaSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
I SeimAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland (APCRC-Q), Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8594-7217
B GlossGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-4394
K F ChambersQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
J A ClementsAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Queensland (APCRC-Q), Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
M R DoranSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. michael.doran@qut.edu.au.
Translational Research Institute · AUAustralian National University · AUDamietta University · EGGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUNorwich Research Park · GBQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is routine to genetically modify cells to express fluorescent or bioluminescent reporter proteins to enable tracking or quantification of cells in vitro and in vivo. Herein, we characterized the stability of luciferase reporter systems in C4-2B prostate cancer cells in mono-culture and in co-culture with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (BMSC). An assumption made when employing the luciferase reporter is that the luciferase expressing cell number and bioluminescence signal are linearly proportional. We observed instances where luciferase expression was significantly upregulated in C4-2B cell populations when co-cultured with BMSC, resulting in a significant disconnect between bioluminescence signal and cell number. We subsequently characterized luciferase reporter stability in a second C4-2B reporter cell line, and six other cancer cell lines. All but the single C4-2B reporter cell population had stable luciferase reporter expression in mono-culture and BMSC co-culture. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that relative number of luciferase gene insertions per genome in the unstable C4-2B reporter cell population was lesser than stable C4-2B, PC3 and MD-MBA-231 luciferase reporter cell lines. We reasoned that the low luciferase gene copy number and genome insertion locations likely contributed to the reporter gene expression being exquisitely sensitive BMSC paracrine signals. In this study, we show that it is possible to generate a range of stable and reliable luciferase reporter prostate- and breast- cancer cell populations but advise not to assume stability across different culture conditions. Reporter stability should be validated, on a case-by-case basis, for each cell line and culture condition.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, ReporterHumansLuciferasesLuminescent MeasurementsLuminescent ProteinsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsPromoter Regions, GeneticProstatic NeoplasmsTransgenesLuciferasesLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31383876
PMCPMC6683182
OpenAlexW2964807331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.