SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2019
The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of deep brain stimulation surgery for substance use disorder: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.Neurosurgery · 2020Pooled it
- Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials in 106 Patients.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Review
- Stimulation of bed nucleus of the stria terminalis area for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder and comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms: a systematic literature review.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2025Review
- Behavioral disorders in Parkinson disease: current view.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Review
- Insertional effect following electrode implantation: an underreported but important phenomenon.Brain communications · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of Treatment Outcome Predictors in Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Methodological Considerations for Setting Up Deep Brain Stimulation Studies for New Indications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Oscillatory activity in the BNST/ALIC and the frontal cortex in OCD: acute effects of DBS.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Article
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Intractable Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Progress and Opportunities.The American journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- Sustained Recovery in a Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patient After Deep Brain Stimulation Battery Failure.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- The Long and Winding Road of Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges in Developing an Intervention for Difficult-to-Treat Mood Disorders.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-intervention-related effects have long been recognized in an array of medical interventions, to which surgical procedures like deep-brain stimulation are no exception. While the existence of placebo and micro-lesion effects has been convincingly demonstrated in DBS for major depression and Parkinson's disease, systematic investigations for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are currently lacking. We therefore undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis with the aim of quantifying the effect of DBS for severe, treatment-resistant OCD that is not due to the electrical stimulation of brain tissue. The MEDLINE/PubMed database was searched for double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trials published in English between 1998 and 2018. Individual patient data was obtained from the original authors and combined in a meta-analysis. We assessed differences from baseline in obsessive-compulsive symptoms following sham treatment, as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, randomizing 49 patients to two periods of active or sham stimulation. To preclude confounding by period effects, our estimate was based only on data from those patients who underwent sham stimulation first (n = 24). We found that sham stimulation induced a significant change in the Y-BOCS score (t = -3.15, P < 0.005), lowering it by 4.9 ± 1.6 points [95% CI = (-8.0, -1.8)]. We conclude that non-stimulation-related effects of DBS exist also in OCD. The identification of the factors determining the magnitude and occurrence of these effects will help to design strategies that will ultimately lead to a betterment of future randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.