ReviewThe oncologist2020
Perspectives on Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.
Review in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05234177 (Tempus CRC Surveillance Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tempus CRC Surveillance Study: A Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Biomarker Profiling Study of Patients With Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Using Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)Assays
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validity of a two-antibody testing algorithm for mismatch repair deficiency testing in cancer; a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022Pooled it
- Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab): a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Exosome-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Recent progress and therapeutic strategies in the treatment of cervical neuroendocrine neoplasms (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Noncanonical Transcription and Splicing Shape the Colorectal Cancer Immunopeptidome in MSI and MSS Tumors.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Chromosome 1 Open Reading Frame 35 Drives Colorectal Cancer Progression by Enhancing Tumor-Intrinsic Proliferation and CD8MedComm · 2026Article
- Time to Treatment Discontinuation and Cost Effectiveness of Third-Line Therapies in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Real-World Evidence from the NIH All of Us Research Program.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Preclinical assessment of genetically modified exosomes for colorectal cancer immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Article
- Severe renal toxicity following adjuvant envafolimab in a patient with ultra-hypermutated (POLE) stage II colorectal cancer: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Precision Medicine in Colorectal Cancer: Targeted Therapies and Biomarker Insights.Current cancer drug targets · 2026Review
- H&E-based MSI/MMR testing with AI in colorectal cancer: a multi-centred blinded evaluation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of novel gene-based risk score for prognosis in prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impeding Quorum Sensing Among the Intestinal Microbiota Impacts the Metastatic Rate of Colorectal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Simultaneous double primary malignant tumors of MSS/pMMR ascending colon cancer and MSI-H/dMMR duodenal cancer with nearly 2 years of recurrence-free survival after MDT-guided comprehensive treatment: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection: An insight into colorectal cancer and FDA-approved biomarkers.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- Focus on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-related Intestinal Inflammation: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutical Approach.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2024Review
- Predictive significance of FGFR4 p.G388R polymorphism in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Construction and verification of a histone deacetylases-related prognostic signature model for colon cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite lengthening survival, death rates from metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unacceptably high, with a bright spot being the demonstration of durable responses in patients with CRC who have mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors and are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as nivolumab in combination with low-dose ipilimumab-all checkpoint inhibitors-are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Nonetheless, there are a number of questions and considerations in the use of these checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Using a question-and-answer format, this review summarizes the scientific rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in CRC, including the effects of tumor factors such as genetic aberrations and mutational load on the immune response, particularly in patients with MSI-H/dMMR disease. We discuss response patterns, response criteria, and immune-related adverse events using findings from published efficacy and safety data of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic CRC. We also discuss issues surrounding treatment sequencing, incorporating approved checkpoint inhibitors into the current treatment paradigm, and the multiple investigational strategies that may optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC in the future, including novel combination therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the U.S. Despite advances in chemotherapy, survival remains poor for patients with metastatic CRC. Certain immunotherapy agents have demonstrated long-lasting responses in previously treated patients with immune-responsive microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic CRC, leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab (with or without low-dose ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab in this population. Combination therapy (e.g., nivolumab with low-dose ipilimumab) has demonstrated numerically higher response rates and improved long-term clinical benefit relative to anti-programmed death-1 monotherapy. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in the broader CRC population and novel combinations to optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.