Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31383721›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.

Ken G Dodds, John C McEwan, Rudiger Brauning, Tracey C van Stijn, Suzanne J Rowe, K Mary McEwan, Shannon M Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Construction of relatedness matrices in autopolyploid populations using low-depth high-throughput sequencing data.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ken G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand ken.dodds@agresearch.co.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-9347-6379
John C McEwanAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4801-6207
Rudiger BrauningAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5068-9166
Tracey C van StijnAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3714-3542
Suzanne J RoweAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-5960
K Mary McEwanAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand.
Shannon M ClarkeAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-8917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotypes are often used to assign parentage in agricultural and ecological settings. Sequencing can be used to obtain genotypes but does not provide unambiguous genotype calls, especially when sequencing depth is low in order to reduce costs. In that case, standard parentage analysis methods no longer apply. A strategy for using low-depth sequencing data for parentage assignment is developed here. It entails the use of relatedness estimates along with a metric termed excess mismatch rate which, for parent-offspring pairs or trios, is the difference between the observed mismatch rate and the rate expected under a model of inheritance and allele reads without error. When more than one putative parent has similar statistics, bootstrapping can provide a measure of the relatedness similarity. Putative parent-offspring trios can be further checked for consistency by comparing the offspring's estimated inbreeding to half the parent relatedness. Suitable thresholds are required for each metric. These methods were applied to a deer breeding operation consisting of two herds of different breeds. Relatedness estimates were more in line with expectation when the herds were analyzed separately than when combined, although this did not alter which parents were the best matches with each offspring. Parentage results were largely consistent with those based on a microsatellite parentage panel with three discordant parent assignments out of 1561. Two models are investigated to allow the parentage metrics to be calculated with non-random selection of alleles. The tools and strategies given here allow parentage to be assigned from low-depth sequencing data.

Indexed as

GenomicsGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesPedigreeAlgorithmsAllelesBreedingDatabases, GeneticFamilyGene FrequencyMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAexclusiongenomic relationship matrixgenotyping-by-sequencingmismatch rateparentage

Identifiers

PMID31383721
PMCPMC6778805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.