ArticleBMJ open2019
Technical and scale efficiency of provincial health systems in China: a bootstrapping data envelopment analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analysing the Efficiency of Health Systems: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Beyond Efficiency Scores: Explaining Health System Performance Using Two-Stage Bootstrap DEA and Machine Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Technical efficiency of sub-district level hospitals in Bangladesh: a comparative frontier analysis.Health economics review · 2026Article
- A study on the efficiency and spatial correlation of health resource allocation in Chinese hospitals.PloS one · 2026Article
- Three decades in healthcare service efficiency evaluation: a bootstrapping Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) of Ministry of Health Malaysia.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of pilot public hospital reform on efficiencies: a DEA analysis of county hospitals in East China, 2009-2015.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Technical efficiency and its determinants in health service delivery of public health centers in East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: Two-stage data envelope analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Effects of medical consortium policy on health services: an interrupted time-series analysis in Sanming, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Assessing the Efficiency and Productivity of the Hospital Clinics on the Island of Rhodes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Data envelopment analysis for ambulance services of different service providers in urban and rural areas in Ministry of Health Malaysia.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Efficiency measurement and spatial spillover effect of provincial health systems in China: Based on the two-stage network DEA model.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Case study of the beneficiary group distribution of curative care expenditure based on SHA 2011 in Xinjiang autonomous region, China.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Allocation Efficiency of Rural Public Health Resources in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Energy Efficiency and Health Efficiency of Old and New EU Member States.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Tracing scientific outputs in the osteoarthritis research field in China based on publications in the Web of Science.Osteoarthritis and cartilage openReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWith escalating health expenditures and increasing health needs, improving health system performance has become imperative in China and internationally. The objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of China's health system and to understand the underlying causes of the variation in efficiency across provinces.
settingA system-wide perspective is adopted, focusing on performance in maternal health, child health and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the 31 provinces of mainland China during 2015.
methodsAnalyses were performed using bootstrapping data envelopment technique. Health outcomes were measured by infant survival rates, maternal survival rates and healthy life years calculated only considering NCDs. Health inputs were measured using health expenditure, and density of medical personnel and hospital beds. The model also examined the impact of environmental factors on health system efficiency.
resultsDue to wide-spread scale inefficiency in the country, the average bias-corrected overall technical efficiency (OTE) was 0.8022 (95% CI values ranging from 0.7251 to 0.8492). Socioeconomic status, hospitalisation rate and share of out-of-pocket expenditures were significant determinants of OTE. Nearly 60% of the provinces operated at a decreasing return to scale, meaning that a gain in efficiency could be achieved only through downsizing the scale of operation.
conclusionsGiven the pervasive nature of diminishing returns across provinces, health policy makers must explore the optimum operational scale which is people-centred and focused on prevention, rather than on treatment, of diseases. Moreover, due consideration should be afforded to social determinants of health and health financing arrangements to complement health-sector based reforms and meet the ambitious goals of the Healthy China 2030 Plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.