Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31383695›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Attitudes of doctors and nurses to patient safety and errors in medical practice in the Gaza-Strip: a cross-sectional study.

Bettina Bottcher, Nasser Abu-El-Noor, Yousef Abuowda, Maha Alfaqawi, Enas Alaloul, Somaya El-Hout, Ibrahem Al-Najjar, Mysoon Abu-El-Noor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bettina BottcherIslamic University of Gaza, Faculty of Medicine, Gaza, State of Palestine bettina.bottcher@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7457-7265
Nasser Abu-El-NoorIslamic University of Gaza Faculty of Nursing, Gaza, State of Palestine.
Yousef AbuowdaIslamic University of Gaza, Faculty of Medicine, Gaza, State of Palestine.
Maha AlfaqawiIslamic University of Gaza, Faculty of Medicine, Gaza, State of Palestine.
Enas AlaloulPalestinian Ministry of Health, Gaza, State of Palestine.
Somaya El-HoutPalestinian Ministry of Health, Gaza, State of Palestine.
Ibrahem Al-NajjarIslamic University of Gaza, Faculty of Medicine, Gaza, State of Palestine.
Mysoon Abu-El-NoorIslamic University of Gaza Faculty of Nursing, Gaza, State of Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the attitudes of nurses and doctors to key patient safety concepts, evaluated differences and similarities between professional groups and assessed positive and negative attitudes to identify target areas for future training.

settingFour major governmental hospitals in the Gaza-Strip.

participantsA convenience sample of 424 nurses and 150 physicians working for at least 6 months in the study hospitals. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were mean scores with SD as measured for individual items and nine main patient safety domains assessed by the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were the proportions of doctors and nurses, that gave a positive response to each item, represented as percentage of each group.

resultsNurses and doctors held moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety with five out of nine domain scores >3.5 of 5. Doctors showed slightly more positive attitudes than nurses, despite a smaller proportion of doctors having received patient safety training with 37.5% compared with 41.9% of nurses. Both professions displayed their most positive patient safety attitudes in the same domains ('team functioning' and 'working hours as a cause for error'), as well as their two most negative attitudes ('importance of patient safety in the curriculum' and 'professional incompetence as a cause of error'), demonstrating significant deficits in understanding medical errors. A specific challenge will be the negative attitudes of both professions towards patient safety training for wider dissemination of this content in the postgraduate curriculum.

conclusionPatient safety attitudes were moderately positive in both professional groups. Target of future patient safety training should be enhancing the understanding of error in medicine. Any training has to be motivating and relevant for clinicians, demonstrating its importance in ongoing professional learning.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePatient SafetyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelEducationFemaleHumansMaleMedical ErrorsMiddle EastNeeds AssessmentNursesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamPhysiciansSafety Managementclinical governancegaza-strippalestinepatient safetypostgraduate education of healthcare professionalsquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID31383695
PMCPMC6687030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.