Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31383498›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy2020

The impact analysis of a multiplex PCR respiratory panel for hospitalized pediatric respiratory infections in Japan.

Taito Kitano, Hiroki Nishikawa, Rika Suzuki, Masayuki Onaka, Atsuko Nishiyama, Daisuke Kitagawa, Miyako Oka, Kazue Masuo, Sayaka Yoshida

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Systematic review of economic evaluations for paediatric pulmonary diseases.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Utility and Applicability of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Delphi Consensus.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taito KitanoDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Medical University Hospital, 840 Shijo, Kashihara, Nara, 6348521, Japan. Electronic address: taito.kitano.0110@gmail.com.
Hiroki NishikawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Rika SuzukiDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Masayuki OnakaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Atsuko NishiyamaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Daisuke KitagawaDepartment of Microbiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Miyako OkaDepartment of Microbiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Kazue MasuoDepartment of Microbiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Sayaka YoshidaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 2-897-5 Shichijo West, Nara, Nara, 6308581, Japan.
Nara Prefecture General Medical CenterNara Medical University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid molecular diagnosis of infections has contributed to timely treatments and antimicrobial stewardship. However, the benefit and cost-effectiveness vary in each country or community because they have different standard practices and health care systems. In Japan, rapid antigen tests (RATs) have been frequently used for pediatric respiratory infections. We investigated the impact and cost-effectiveness of a multiplex PCR (mPCR) respiratory panel for pediatric respiratory infections in a Japanese community hospital.

methodsWe replaced RATs with an mPCR respiratory panel (FilmArray®) for admitted pediatric respiratory infections on March 26, 2018. We compared the days of antimicrobial therapy (DOT) and length of stay (LOS) during the mPCR period (March 2018 to April 2019) with those of the RAT period (March 2012 to March 2018).

resultsDuring the RAT and mPCR periods, 1132 and 149 patients were analyzed. The DOT/case was 12.82 vs 8.56 (p < 0.001), and the LOS was 8.18 vs 6.83 days (p = 0.032) in the RAT and mPCR groups, respectively. The total costs during admissions were ∖258,824 ($2331.7) and ∖243,841 ($2196.8)/case, respectively. Pathogen detection rates were 30.2% vs 87.2% (p < 0.001).

conclusionCompared to conventional RATs, the mPCR test contributed to a reduction in the DOT and LOS in a Japanese community hospital for admission-requiring pediatric respiratory infections. However, a proper stewardship program is essential to further reduce the unnecessary usage of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipBacterial InfectionsMolecular TypingMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantJapanMaleRetrospective StudiesTime-to-TreatmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial stewardshipMultiplex PCRPediatricsRapid antigen testRapid molecular testRespiratory infection

Identifiers

PMID31383498
PMCPMC7128379
OpenAlexW2964565573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.