ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2019
Envisioning and shaping translation of knowledge into action: A comparative case-study of stakeholder engagement in the development of a European tobacco control tool.
Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stakeholder-engaged process for refining the design of a clinical trial in home hospice.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- Making intersectoral stakeholder engagement in medicine quality research work: lessons from the STARmeds study in Indonesia.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Patient navigation in German emergency care (NODE). Study protocol of a multi-center mixed-methods trial.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- What is context in knowledge translation? Results of a systematic scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- What makes knowledge translation work in practice? Lessons from a demand-driven and locally led project in Cameroon, Jordan and Nigeria.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Health workforce governance and professions: a re-analysis of New Zealand's primary care workforce policy actors.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice.Ambio · 2023Article
- Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Using a Rapid Knowledge Translation Approach for Better Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Bangladesh, Burundi, Indonesia, and Jordan.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- Participatory codesign of patient involvement in a Learning Health System: How can data-driven care be patient-driven care?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the performance and achievements of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stakeholder engagement in health policy research is often said to increase 'research impact', but the active role of stakeholders in creating impact remains underexplored. We explored how stakeholders shaped the translation of health policy research into action. Our comparative case-study tracked a European research project that aimed to transfer an existing tobacco control return on investment tool. That project also aimed to increase its impact by engaging with stakeholders in further developing the tool. We conducted semi-structured interviews, using an actor-scenario mapping approach. Actor-scenarios can be seen as relational descriptions of a future world. We mapped the scenarios by asking stakeholders to describe who and what would play a role in the tool's utilisation. Our results show that stakeholders envisioned disparate futures for the tool. Some scenarios were specific, whereas most were generic projections of abstract potential users and responsibilities. We show how stakeholders mobilised elements of context, such as legislative support and agricultural practice, that would affect the tool's use. We conclude that stakeholders shape knowledge translation processes by continuously putting forth explicit or implicit scenarios about the future. Mapping actor-scenarios may help in aligning knowledge production with utilisation. Insights into potential roles and responsibilities could be fed back in research projects with the aim of increasing the likelihood that the study results may be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.