Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31383039›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2019

Urinary DNA methylation biomarkers for prediction of prostate cancer upgrading and upstaging.

Arnas Bakavicius, Kristina Daniunaite, Kristina Zukauskaite, Marija Barisiene, Sonata Jarmalaite, Feliksas Jankevicius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The prognostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. CanEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnas BakaviciusInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Kristina DaniunaiteNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Kristina ZukauskaiteNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Marija BarisieneInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Sonata JarmalaiteNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania. sonata.jarmalaite@nvi.lt.
Feliksas JankeviciusInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant numbers of prostate cancer (PCa) patients experience tumour upstaging and upgrading in surgical specimens that cause serious problems in timely and proper selection of the treatment strategy. This study was aimed at the evaluation of a set of established epigenetic biomarkers as a noninvasive tool for more accurate PCa categorization before radical prostatectomy (RP).

methodsQuantitative methylation-specific PCR was applied for the methylation analysis of RARB, RASSF1, and GSTP1 in 514 preoperatively collected voided or catheterized urine samples from the single-centre cohort of 1056 treatment-naïve PCa patients who underwent RP. The rates of biopsy upgrading and upstaging were analysed in the whole cohort.

resultsPathological examination of RP specimens revealed Gleason score upgrading in 27.2% and upstaging in 20.3% of the patients with a total misclassification rate of 39.0%. DNA methylation changes in at least one gene were detected in more than 80% of urine samples. Combination of the PSA test with the three-gene methylation analysis in urine was a significant predictor of pathological upstaging and upgrading (P < 0.050), however, with limited increase in overall accuracy. The PSA test or each gene alone was not informative enough.

conclusionsThe urinary DNA methylation assay in combination with serum PSA may predict tumour stage or grade migration post-RP aiding in improved individual risk assessment and appropriate treatment selection. Clinical utility of these biomarkers should be proven in larger multi-centre studies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyDNA, NeoplasmGlutathione S-Transferase piHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, Retinoic AcidTumor Suppressor ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmGlutathione S-Transferase piGSTP1 protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenRASSF1 protein, humanReceptors, Retinoic Acidretinoic acid receptor betaTumor Suppressor ProteinsDNA methylationProstate cancerUpgradingUpstagingUrine

Identifiers

PMID31383039
PMCPMC6683454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.