ArticleBMC public health2019
Risk of diabetes mellitus in physicians: a nationwide study in Taiwan.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of vildagliptin versus metformin on hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2024Trial
- Effect of radiotherapy on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib: a nationwide cancer-registry-based study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe heavy workload of physicians in Taiwan may contribute to poor lifestyles and increased risk for diabetes mellitus (DM). We conducted this study to determine the risk for DM among physicians in Taiwan.
methodsWe used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to identify 28,440 physicians and 56,880 comparisons (general population) matched at a ratio of 1:2 by age and sex. Participants who had been diagnosed with DM before 2007 were excluded. We compared the risk for DM between physicians and comparisons by following up since 2007 to 2013. Comparisons among physician subgroups were also performed.
resultsAfter adjustment for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and polycystic ovary syndrome, physicians had a lower risk for DM than the comparisons (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.82). In comparisons among physicians, emergency physicians (AOR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.44-3.40) and surgeons (AOR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05-1.52) had a higher risk for DM than other specialists.
conclusionsThis study found that physicians have a lower risk for DM than the general population and emergency physicians and surgeons have a higher risk for DM than other specialists. Thus, more attention should be paid to the occupational health of these doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.