Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31382859›Full record

ArticleSocial studies of science2019

Datafication and accountability in public health: Introduction to a special issue.

Klaus Hoeyer, Susanne Bauer, Martyn Pickersgill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social studies of science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modeling the epidemiologic individual.History of the human sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klaus HoeyerCentre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-4784
Susanne BauerCentre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Martyn PickersgillCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-9148

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R01910X/1Medical Research Council MR/S035818/1Wellcome Trust 106612/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years and across many nations, public health has become subject to forms of governance that are said to be aimed at establishing accountability. In this introduction to a special issue,

Indexed as

Data AggregationData AnalysisSocial ResponsibilityHumansPublic Healthaccountabilitybig datadatadataficationpopulationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID31382859
PMCPMC6767643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.