ArticlePharmaceutics2019
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Metabolic Drug Interactions between Repaglinide and Celecoxib by a Bioanalytical HPLC Method for Their Simultaneous Determination with Fluorescence Detection.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a green chemistry based bioanalytical method using response surface methodology to analyze febuxostat and indomethacin in rabbit plasma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Variability in intestinal drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in Crohn's disease and potential impact on oral drug absorption.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Assessment of a Promising Vasorelaxant, Analgesic, and Anti-Inflammatory Prototype 5-[1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-2H-tetrazole (LQFM020) Through Selective Bioanalytical HPLC-PDA-Based Method.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2025Article
- DoE-assisted HPLC method development and validation of enzalutamide and repaglinide in rat plasma.Bioanalysis · 2024Article
- Effect ofFuture journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Article
- Assessment of Metabolic Interaction between Repaglinide and Quercetin via Mixed Inhibition in the Liver: In Vitro and In Vivo.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Detection of anabolic steroidsRSC advances · 2020Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Metabolic Drug Interaction Potential of Dutasteride with Ketoconazole.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis are highly prevalent diseases, combinations of antidiabetic agents like repaglinide (REP) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) like celecoxib (CEL) could be commonly used in clinical practice. In this study, a simple and sensitive bioanalytical HPLC method combined with fluorescence detector (HPLC-FL) was developed and fully validated for simultaneous quantification of REP and CEL. A simple protein precipitation procedure and reversed C18 column with an isocratic mobile phase (mixture of ACN and pH 6.0 phosphate buffer) were employed for sample preparation and chromatographic separation. The fluorescence detector was set at a single excitation/emission wavelength pair of 240 nm/380 nm. The linearity (10-2000 ng/mL), accuracy, precision, extraction recovery, matrix effect, and stability for this method were validated as per the current FDA guidance. The bioanalytical method was applied to study pharmacokinetic interactions between REP and CEL in vivo, successfully showing that concurrent administration with oral REP significantly altered the pharmacokinetics of oral CEL. Furthermore, an in vitro metabolism and protein binding study using human materials highlighted the possibility of metabolism-based interactions between CEL and REP in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.