ArticlePharmaceutics2019
Comparison of Target Features for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions by Deep Neural Network Based on Large-Scale Drug-Induced Transcriptome Data.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing AI to fuse phenotypic signatures for drug target identification: progress in computational modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Recent Development, Applications, and Patents of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Design and Development.Current drug discovery technologies · 2025Review
- A review of machine learning-based methods for predicting drug-target interactions.Health information science and systems · 2024Review
- Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence as a Facilitating Tool for Formulation Development in Fluidized Bed Processor: a Comprehensive Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Drug target prediction through deep learning functional representation of gene signatures.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The Sesquiterpene Lactone-Rich Fraction ofCancers · 2023Article
- Omics Data and Data Representations for Deep Learning-Based Predictive Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Development of a chemogenomics library for phenotypic screening.Journal of cheminformatics · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Survey of Recent Drug Discovery Using Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery.Molecular diversity · 2021Review
- Semantic similarity and machine learning with ontologies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Drug-target affinity prediction using graph neural network and contact maps.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Similarity-Based Methods and Machine Learning Approaches for Target Prediction in Early Drug Discovery: Performance and Scope.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uncovering drug-target interactions (DTIs) is pivotal to understand drug mode-of-action (MoA), avoid adverse drug reaction (ADR), and seek opportunities for drug repositioning (DR). For decades, in silico predictions for DTIs have largely depended on structural information of both targets and compounds, e.g., docking or ligand-based virtual screening. Recently, the application of deep neural network (DNN) is opening a new path to uncover novel DTIs for thousands of targets. One important question is which features for targets are most relevant to DTI prediction. As an early attempt to answer this question, we objectively compared three canonical target features extracted from: (i) the expression profiles by gene knockdown (GEPs); (ii) the protein-protein interaction network (PPI network); and (iii) the pathway membership (PM) of a target gene. For drug features, the large-scale drug-induced transcriptome dataset, or the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) L1000 dataset was used. All these features are closely related to protein function or drug MoA, of which utility is only sparsely investigated. In particular, few studies have compared the three types of target features in DNN-based DTI prediction under the same evaluation scheme. Among the three target features, the PM and the PPI network show similar performances superior to GEPs. DNN models based on both features consistently outperformed other machine learning methods such as naïve Bayes, random forest, or logistic regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.