Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31382165›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2019

Down-Regulation of S100A8 is an Independent Predictor of PSA Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy.

Sarah Minner, Dominik Hager, Stefan Steurer, Doris Höflmayer, Maria Christina Tsourlakis, Christina Möller-Koop, Till S Clauditz, Claudia Hube-Magg, Andreas M Luebke, Ronald Simon and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah MinnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Dominik HagerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Stefan SteurerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Doris HöflmayerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Maria Christina TsourlakisInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Christina Möller-KoopInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Till S ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Andreas M LuebkeInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. Electronic address: r.simon@uke.de.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Cosima GöbelInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Sören WeidemannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Patrick LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
David DumInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Christoph FrauneInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jakob IzbickiGeneral, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Thorsten SchlommDepartment of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hartwig HulandMartini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany.
Hans HeinzerMartini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany.
Alexander HaeseMartini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany.
Markus GraefenMartini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany.
Asmus HeumannGeneral, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEMartini-Klinik · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of S100A8 is described in many different human tumor types, but its role in prostate cancer is unknown. To evaluate the clinical relevance of S100A8 expression in prostate cancer, a tissue microarray containing 13,665 tumors was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Cytoplasmic S100A8 staining was compared to prostate cancer phenotype, patient prognosis and molecular features including TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status and deletions of PTEN, 3p, 5q and 6q. S100A8 immunostaining was typically seen in normal prostate tissue but lost in 60% of 9786 interpretable prostate cancers. In the remaining tumors, S100A8 was considered weak in 17.9%, moderate in 17.8% and strong in 5.4% of cases. Loss of S100A8 expression was linked to advanced tumor stage, high Gleason grade, positive nodal status, positive surgical margin and high preoperative PSA (P < .0001 each). In addition, loss of S100A8 expression was associated with TMPRSS2:ERG fusions (P < .0001), deletions of PTEN, 3p, and 6q (P < .005), and a high number of genomic deletions per tumor (P = .0009). Absence of S100A8 immunostaining was also linked to an elevated risk for early PSA recurrence (P < .0001). In a multivariate analysis limited to features that are preoperatively available, the prognostic impact of S100A8 expression (P < .0001) was independent of clinical stage, Gleason grade, and serum PSA level (P < .0001). Taken together, the results of our study demonstrate that complete loss of S100A8 expression is linked to adverse tumor features and predicts early biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer. S100A8 measurement, either alone or in combination might be of clinical utility in prostate cancers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCalgranulin AGene DeletionHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOncogene Proteins, FusionPhenotypePrognosisProstatectomyBiomarkers, TumorCalgranulin AOncogene Proteins, FusionProstate-Specific AntigenS100A8 protein, humanTMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31382165
PMCPMC6698296
OpenAlexW2966106083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.