ReviewInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019
The Implications of Genetic Testing on Radiation Therapy Decisions: A Guide for Radiation Oncologists.
Review in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- A genome-wide association study on radiation induced fibrosis in breast cancer patients.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- From Cellular Radiosensitivity to Precision Radiotherapy: Integrating Functional Assays, Genomics, and Clinical Modeling.Cancers · 2026Review
- Dual radiation-induced sarcomas after breast cancer in a TP53 variant carrier.Familial cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors Potentiate Proton Therapy End-of-Range Effects by Accelerating Replication Forks and Promoting Transcription Conflict.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Immune and inflammatory radiogenomics of radiotherapy-induced normal-tissue toxicity: genetic susceptibility, mechanisms, risk prediction, and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Attenuation of ATM signaling by ROS delays replicative senescence at physiological oxygen.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- Association Between Genomic Features and Radiation Response in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Palliative Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Drosophila melanogaster: an old and future ally to radiobiology.Journal of radiation research · 2025Review
- Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer in Patients with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: A Critical Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Investigating Chromosomal Radiosensitivity in Inborn Errors of Immunity: Insights from DNA Repair Disorders and Beyond.Journal of clinical immunology · 2025Article
- Towards Personalized Radiotherapy in Pelvic Cancer: Patient-Related Risk Factors for Late Radiation Toxicity.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Review
- Article
- KEAP1-mutant atypical meningioma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Heterogeneity in precision oncology.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2024Review
- Application of Nanoparticles in Cancer Treatment: A Concise Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A genomic score to predict local control among patients with brain metastases managed with radiation.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer: A literature review and case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of affordable and rapid next-generation DNA sequencing technology, along with the US Supreme Court ruling invalidating gene patents, has led to a deluge of germline and tumor genetic variant tests that are being rapidly incorporated into clinical cancer decision-making. A major concern for clinicians is whether the presence of germline mutations may increase the risk of radiation toxicity or secondary malignancies. Because scarce clinical data exist to inform decisions at this time, the American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a group of radiation science experts and clinicians to summarize potential issues, review relevant data, and provide guidance for adult patients and their care teams regarding the impact, if any, that genetic testing should have on radiation therapy recommendations. During the American Society for Radiation Oncology workshop, several main points emerged, which are discussed in this manuscript: (1) variants of uncertain significance should be considered nondeleterious until functional genomic data emerge to demonstrate otherwise; (2) possession of germline alterations in a single copy of a gene critical for radiation damage responses does not necessarily equate to increased risk of radiation-induced toxicity; (3) deleterious ataxia-telangiesctasia gene mutations may modestly increase second cancer risk after radiation therapy, and thus follow-up for these patients after indicated radiation therapy should include second cancer screening; (4) conveying to patients the difference between relative and absolute risk is critical to decision-making; and (5) more work is needed to assess the impact of tumor somatic alterations on the probability of response to radiation therapy and the potential for individualization of radiation doses. Data on radiosensitivity related to specific genetic mutations is also briefly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.