Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31381960›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

The Implications of Genetic Testing on Radiation Therapy Decisions: A Guide for Radiation Oncologists.

Carmen Bergom, Catharine M West, Daniel S Higginson, Mohamed E Abazeed, Banu Arun, Soren M Bentzen, Jonine L Bernstein, Jaden D Evans, Naamit K Gerber, Sarah L Kerns and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. KEAP1-mutant atypical meningioma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024
    Article
  16. Heterogeneity in precision oncology.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmen BergomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Catharine M WestDivision of Cancer Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Daniel S HigginsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mohamed E AbazeedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Translational Hematology Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Banu ArunDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Soren M BentzenDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jonine L BernsteinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jaden D EvansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology and Precision Genomics, Intermountain Healthcare, Ogden, Utah.
Naamit K GerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Sarah L KernsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Judy KeenScientific Affairs, American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia.
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Anne S ReinerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nadeem RiazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Barry S RosensteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Gabriel O SawakuchiDepartment of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Simona F ShaitelmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Simon N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wendy A WoodwardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: wwoodward@mdanderson.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAmerican Society for Radiation Oncology · USCleveland Clinic · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USIntermountain Healthcare · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USNational Health Service · GBNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Risk Prediction for Development of Adverse Effects FOllowing Radiotherapy for Prostate CancerK07CA187546 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KERNS, SARAH L. · 2015 to 2019
$649k
Cancer Research UK 18504NCI NIH HHS K07 CA187546NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of affordable and rapid next-generation DNA sequencing technology, along with the US Supreme Court ruling invalidating gene patents, has led to a deluge of germline and tumor genetic variant tests that are being rapidly incorporated into clinical cancer decision-making. A major concern for clinicians is whether the presence of germline mutations may increase the risk of radiation toxicity or secondary malignancies. Because scarce clinical data exist to inform decisions at this time, the American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a group of radiation science experts and clinicians to summarize potential issues, review relevant data, and provide guidance for adult patients and their care teams regarding the impact, if any, that genetic testing should have on radiation therapy recommendations. During the American Society for Radiation Oncology workshop, several main points emerged, which are discussed in this manuscript: (1) variants of uncertain significance should be considered nondeleterious until functional genomic data emerge to demonstrate otherwise; (2) possession of germline alterations in a single copy of a gene critical for radiation damage responses does not necessarily equate to increased risk of radiation-induced toxicity; (3) deleterious ataxia-telangiesctasia gene mutations may modestly increase second cancer risk after radiation therapy, and thus follow-up for these patients after indicated radiation therapy should include second cancer screening; (4) conveying to patients the difference between relative and absolute risk is critical to decision-making; and (5) more work is needed to assess the impact of tumor somatic alterations on the probability of response to radiation therapy and the potential for individualization of radiation doses. Data on radiosensitivity related to specific genetic mutations is also briefly discussed.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingMutationRadiation OncologistsAdultAtaxia TelangiectasiaAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsClinical Decision-MakingConsensusDNA RepairGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic VariationGerm-Line MutationHealth Care SurveysHeterozygoteHumansAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31381960
PMCPMC11913060
OpenAlexW2965872538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.