Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31381606›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Projections of epidemic transmission and estimation of vaccination impact during an ongoing Ebola virus disease outbreak in Northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, as of Feb. 25, 2019.

Lee Worden, Rae Wannier, Nicole A Hoff, Kamy Musene, Bernice Selo, Mathias Mossoko, Emile Okitolonda-Wemakoy, Jean Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, George W Rutherford, Thomas M Lietman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Impact of the SARS-CoV-19 Pandemic on the Global Gross Domestic Product.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lee WordenF. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Rae WannierF. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-3966
Nicole A HoffDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Kamy MuseneDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Bernice SeloMinistry of Health, Directorate of Primary Health Care Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Mathias MossokoMinistry of Health, Directorate of Primary Health Care Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Emile Okitolonda-WemakoyKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Jean Jacques Muyembe TamfumNational Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
George W RutherfordSchool of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Thomas M LietmanF. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Anne W RimoinDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Travis C PorcoF. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8813-3171
J Daniel KellyF. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-0321

Funding

"Modeling contact investigation and rapid response"U01GM087728 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PORCO, TRAVIS CHRISTIAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
Understanding the epidemiology and natural history of unrecognized Ebola virus infectionK23AI146268 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KELLY, JOHN DANIEL · 2019 to 2022
$748k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI146268NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI126521NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM087728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs of February 25, 2019, 875 cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) were reported in North Kivu and Ituri Provinces, Democratic Republic of Congo. Since the beginning of October 2018, the outbreak has largely shifted into regions in which active armed conflict has occurred, and in which EVD cases and their contacts have been difficult for health workers to reach. We used available data on the current outbreak, with case-count time series from prior outbreaks, to project the short-term and long-term course of the outbreak.

methodsFor short- and long-term projections, we modeled Ebola virus transmission using a stochastic branching process that assumes gradually quenching transmission rates estimated from past EVD outbreaks, with outbreak trajectories conditioned on agreement with the course of the current outbreak, and with multiple levels of vaccination coverage. We used two regression models to estimate similar projection periods. Short- and long-term projections were estimated using negative binomial autoregression and Theil-Sen regression, respectively. We also used Gott's rule to estimate a baseline minimum-information projection. We then constructed an ensemble of forecasts to be compared and recorded for future evaluation against final outcomes. From August 20, 2018 to February 25, 2019, short-term model projections were validated against known case counts.

resultsDuring validation of short-term projections, from one week to four weeks, we found models consistently scored higher on shorter-term forecasts. Based on case counts as of February 25, the stochastic model projected a median case count of 933 cases by February 18 (95% prediction interval: 872-1054) and 955 cases by March 4 (95% prediction interval: 874-1105), while the auto-regression model projects median case counts of 889 (95% prediction interval: 876-933) and 898 (95% prediction interval: 877-983) cases for those dates, respectively. Projected median final counts range from 953 to 1,749. Although the outbreak is already larger than all past Ebola outbreaks other than the 2013-2016 outbreak of over 26,000 cases, our models do not project that it is likely to grow to that scale. The stochastic model estimates that vaccination coverage in this outbreak is lower than reported in its trial setting in Sierra Leone.

conclusionsOur projections are concentrated in a range up to about 300 cases beyond those already reported. While a catastrophic outbreak is not projected, it is not ruled out, and prevention and vigilance are warranted. Prospective validation of our models in real time allowed us to generate more accurate short-term forecasts, and this process may prove useful for future real-time short-term forecasting. We estimate that transmission rates are higher than would be seen under target levels of 62% coverage due to contact tracing and vaccination, and this model estimate may offer a surrogate indicator for the outbreak response challenges.

Indexed as

Vaccination CoverageDemocratic Republic of the CongoDisease OutbreaksEbolavirusHealth PersonnelHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansModels, TheoreticalProspective StudiesRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31381606
PMCPMC6695208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.