Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31381573›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Kankanet: An artificial neural network-based object detection smartphone application and mobile microscope as a point-of-care diagnostic aid for soil-transmitted helminthiases.

Ariel Yang, Nahid Bakhtari, Liana Langdon-Embry, Emile Redwood, Simon Grandjean Lapierre, Patricia Rakotomanga, Armand Rafalimanantsoa, Juan De Dios Santos, Inès Vigan-Womas, Astrid M Knoblauch and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ariel YangSchool of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-6087
Nahid BakhtariSchool of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Liana Langdon-EmbrySchool of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Emile RedwoodSchool of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Simon Grandjean LapierreGlobal Health Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Patricia RakotomangaHelminthiasis Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Armand RafalimanantsoaHelminthiasis Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Juan De Dios SantosDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2726-1900
Inès Vigan-WomasImmunology of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Astrid M KnoblauchGlobal Health Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Luis A MarcosGlobal Health Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndemic areas for soil-transmitted helminthiases often lack the tools and trained personnel necessary for point-of-care diagnosis. This study pilots the use of smartphone microscopy and an artificial neural network-based (ANN) object detection application named Kankanet to address those two needs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA smartphone was equipped with a USB Video Class (UVC) microscope attachment and Kankanet, which was trained to recognize eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and hookworm using a dataset of 2,078 images. It was evaluated for interpretive accuracy based on 185 new images. Fecal samples were processed using Kato-Katz (KK), spontaneous sedimentation technique in tube (SSTT), and Merthiolate-Iodine-Formaldehyde (MIF) techniques. UVC imaging and ANN interpretation of these slides was compared to parasitologist interpretation of standard microscopy.Relative to a gold standard defined as any positive result from parasitologist reading of KK, SSTT, and MIF preparations through standard microscopy, parasitologists reading UVC imaging of SSTT achieved a comparable sensitivity (82.9%) and specificity (97.1%) in A. lumbricoides to standard KK interpretation (97.0% sensitivity, 96.0% specificity). The UVC could not accurately image T. trichiura or hookworm. Though Kankanet interpretation was not quite as sensitive as parasitologist interpretation, it still achieved high sensitivity for A. lumbricoides and hookworm (69.6% and 71.4%, respectively). Kankanet showed high sensitivity for T. trichiura in microscope images (100.0%), but low in UVC images (50.0%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The UVC achieved comparable sensitivity to standard microscopy with only A. lumbricoides. With further improvement of image resolution and magnification, UVC shows promise as a point-of-care imaging tool. In addition to smartphone microscopy, ANN-based object detection can be developed as a diagnostic aid. Though trained with a limited dataset, Kankanet accurately interprets both standard microscope and low-quality UVC images. Kankanet may achieve sensitivity comparable to parasitologists with continued expansion of the image database and improvement of machine learning technology.

Indexed as

MicroscopyPoint-of-Care SystemsSmartphoneAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAscaris lumbricoidesFecesHelminthiasisHookworm InfectionsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMadagascarNeural Networks, ComputerParasite Egg CountSensitivity and SpecificitySoftwareSoil

Identifiers

PMID31381573
PMCPMC6695198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.