Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31381562›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Distinct roles of RAD52 and POLQ in chromosomal break repair and replication stress response.

Andrew A Kelso, Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado, Ragini Bhargava, Jeremy M Stark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic Assemblies in Genome Maintenance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew A KelsoDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-1296
Felicia Wednesday LopezcoloradoDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2916-6042
Ragini BhargavaDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States of America.
Jeremy M StarkDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2625-5373
City of Hope · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
DNA Damage Response and Oncogenic SignalingT32CA186895 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI BINGHUI SHEN, Jeremy Michael Stark · 2016 to 2026
$2.1M
Regulation of Single Strand Annealing Repair of Mammalian Chromosomal BreaksR01CA197506 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI STARK, JEREMY MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197506NCI NIH HHS T32 CA186895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disrupting either the DNA annealing factor RAD52 or the A-family DNA polymerase POLQ can cause synthetic lethality with defects in BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are tumor suppressors important for homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), and protection of stalled replication forks. A likely mechanism of this synthetic lethality is that RAD52 and/or POLQ are important for backup pathways for DSB repair and/or replication stress responses. The features of DSB repair events that require RAD52 vs. POLQ, and whether combined disruption of these factors causes distinct effects on genome maintenance, have been unclear. Using human U2OS cells, we generated a cell line with POLQ mutations upstream of the polymerase domain, a RAD52 knockout cell line, and a line with combined disruption of both genes. We also examined RAD52 and POLQ using RNA-interference. We find that combined disruption of RAD52 and POLQ causes at least additive hypersensitivity to cisplatin, and a synthetic reduction in replication fork restart velocity. We also examined the influence of RAD52 and POLQ on several DSB repair events. We find that RAD52 is particularly important for repair using ≥ 50 nt repeat sequences that flank the DSB, and that also involve removal of non-homologous sequences flanking the repeats. In contrast, POLQ is important for repair events using 6 nt (but not ≥ 18 nt) of flanking repeats that are at the edge of the break, as well as oligonucleotide microhomology-templated (i.e., 12-20 nt) repair events requiring nascent DNA synthesis. Finally, these factors show key distinctions with BRCA2, regarding effects on DSB repair events and response to stalled replication forks. These findings indicate that RAD52 and POLQ have distinct roles in genome maintenance, including for specific features of DSB repair events, such that combined disruption of these factors may be effective for genotoxin sensitization and/or synthetic lethal strategies.

Indexed as

Recombinational DNA RepairBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCell Line, TumorCisplatinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase thetaDNA ReplicationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMutationNeoplasmsRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinSynthetic Lethal MutationsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCisplatinDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase thetaRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31381562
PMCPMC6695211
OpenAlexW2966053746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.