Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31381504›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Identifying Influence Agents That Promote Physical Activity Through the Simulation of Social Network Interventions: Agent-Based Modeling Study.

Thabo J van Woudenberg, Bojan Simoski, Eric Fernandes de Mello Araújo, Kirsten E Bevelander, William J Burk, Crystal R Smit, Laura Buijs, Michel Klein, Moniek Buijzen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04966104 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

ODYSSEE-vCHAT Pilot Trial: a Virtual Community Promoting Health Literacy, Self-Care, and Peer Support for Heart Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled61ConditionsHeart FailureArmsODYSSEE-vCHAT
NCT05560737 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

ODYSSEE-vCHAT Mental Health Study: A Virtual Community Promoting Health Literacy, Self-Care, and Peer Support for Heart Failure and Kidney Disease

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled215ConditionsChronic Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney DiseasesArmsODYSSEE-vCHAT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Diffusion/Contagion Processes on Social Networks.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Social Norms on Diffusion Dynamics: A Simulation of E-Cigarette Use Behavior.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thabo J van Woudenberg *Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8586-5876
Bojan Simoski *Social AI Group, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6579-7634
Eric Fernandes de Mello AraújoSocial AI Group, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4263-9075
Kirsten E BevelanderBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9881-3266
William J BurkBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-0773
Crystal R Smit *Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5647-9319
Laura BuijsBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1494-6609
Michel KleinSocial AI Group, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4119-1846
Moniek BuijzenBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3780-0856
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial network interventions targeted at children and adolescents can have a substantial effect on their health behaviors, including physical activity. However, designing successful social network interventions is a considerable research challenge. In this study, we rely on social network analysis and agent-based simulations to better understand and capitalize on the complex interplay of social networks and health behaviors. More specifically, we investigate criteria for selecting influence agents that can be expected to produce the most successful social network health interventions.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to test which selection criterion to determine influence agents in a social network intervention resulted in the biggest increase in physical activity in the social network. To test the differences among the selection criteria, a computational model was used to simulate different social network interventions and observe the intervention's effect on the physical activity of primary and secondary school children within their school classes. As a next step, this study relied on the outcomes of the simulated interventions to investigate whether social network interventions are more effective in some classes than others based on network characteristics.

methodsWe used a previously validated agent-based model to understand how physical activity spreads in social networks and who was influencing the spread of behavior. From the observed data of 460 participants collected in 26 school classes, we simulated multiple social network interventions with different selection criteria for the influence agents (ie, in-degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and random influence agents) and a control condition (ie, no intervention). Subsequently, we investigated whether the detected variation of an intervention's success within school classes could be explained by structural characteristics of the social networks (ie, network density and network centralization).

resultsThe 1-year simulations showed that social network interventions were more effective compared with the control condition (beta=.30; t100=3.23; P=.001). In addition, the social network interventions that used a measure of centrality to select influence agents outperformed the random influence agent intervention (beta=.46; t100=3.86; P<.001). Also, the closeness centrality condition outperformed the betweenness centrality condition (beta=.59; t100=2.02; P=.046). The anticipated interaction effects of the network characteristics were not observed.

conclusionsSocial network intervention can be considered as a viable and promising intervention method to promote physical activity. We demonstrated the usefulness of applying social network analysis and agent-based modeling as part of the social network interventions' design process. We emphasize the importance of selecting the most successful influence agents and provide a better understanding of the role of network characteristics on the effectiveness of social network interventions.

Indexed as

ExercisePeer InfluenceSchoolsSocial NetworkingAdolescentChildComputer SimulationFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleSystems Analysisadolescent healthcomputer simulationpeer groupphysical activitysocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID31381504
PMCPMC6699133
OpenAlexW2947256654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.