ReviewCancer2019
Unlocking the potential of population-based cancer registries.
Review in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An Exploration of the Utility and Impacts of Implementation Science Strategies by Cancer Registries for Healthcare Improvement: A Systematic Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Epidemiological Studies of Colorectal Cancer by Record Linkage of Cancer Registries and Biospecimen Data: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Pooled it
- The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Trial
- Nationwide treatment patterns and outcomes of localised soft tissue sarcoma in Austria: real-world data from the Austrian Sarcoma Registry.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Twenty-First Century Data Systems: Evolving Cancer Registries to a Learning Health System.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in Cancer Burden and 27 Subtypes Among Women of Childbearing Age Globally from 1990 to 2021.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Nationwide trends in childhood cancer incidence and survival in Iran: analysis of national cancer registry data, 2005-2014.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Concept and feasibility of privacy-preserving record linkage of cancer registry data and claims data in Germany: results from the DigiNet study on stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A bibliometric study on mathematical oncology: interdisciplinarity, internationality, collaboration and trending topics.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Real-time data in cancer registries: Validation of an automated data extraction system.iScience · 2025Article
- Registry or randomization - must it be evidence or could it be coincidence?Innovative surgical sciences · 2025Review
- A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Association of commission on cancer accreditation with receipt of guideline-concordant care and survival among patients with colon cancer.World journal of surgery · 2025Observational
- Revolutionizing Cancer Registries: The Promise and Challenges of Integrating Molecular Markers for Enhanced Patient Care and Research.Journal of registry management · 2025Article
- Cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis in children and adolescents in the Community of Madrid, 2015-2018.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2024Article
- Heavy-metal associated breast cancer and colorectal cancer hot spots and their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Cancer information and population health resource: a resource for catchment area data and cancer outcomes research.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Hospital Accreditation Status and Treatment Differences Among Black Patients With Colon Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Recruitment of sexual minority and heterosexual colorectal cancer survivors through US cancer registries.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Referral and Evaluation among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Georgia.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population-based cancer registries have improved dramatically over the last 2 decades. These central cancer registries provide a critical framework that can elevate the science of cancer research. There have also been important technical and scientific advances that help to unlock the potential of population-based cancer registries. These advances include improvements in probabilistic record linkage, refinements in natural language processing, the ability to perform genomic sequencing on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and improvements in the ability to identify activity levels of many different signaling molecules in FFPE tissue. This article describes how central cancer registries can provide a population-based sample frame that will lead to studies with strong external validity, how central cancer registries can link with public and private health insurance claims to obtain complete treatment information, how central cancer registries can use informatics techniques to provide population-based rapid case ascertainment, how central cancer registries can serve as a population-based virtual tissue repository, and how population-based cancer registries are essential for guiding the implementation of evidence-based interventions and measuring changes in the cancer burden after the implementation of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.