Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31381138›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2019

Maintaining order: COG complex controls Golgi trafficking, processing, and sorting.

Jessica B Blackburn, Zinia D'Souza, Vladimir V Lupashin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Trafficking and localization of Golgi-residentFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica B BlackburnDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Zinia D'SouzaDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Vladimir V LupashinDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-1962

Funding

Characterization of mammalian COG complex-interacting intra-Golgi trafficking macR01GM083144 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI VLADIMIR V LUPASHIN · 2008 to 2026
$6.5M
Super-Resolution Light Microscope at University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesS10OD018065 · OD · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI STORRIE, BRIAN · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083144NIH HHS S10 OD018065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conserved oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex, a multisubunit tethering complex of the CATCHR (complexes associated with tethering containing helical rods) family, controls membrane trafficking and ensures Golgi homeostasis by orchestrating retrograde vesicle targeting within the Golgi. In humans, COG defects lead to severe multisystemic diseases known as COG-congenital disorders of glycosylation (COG-CDG). The COG complex both physically and functionally interacts with all classes of molecules maintaining intra-Golgi trafficking, namely SNAREs, SNARE-interacting proteins, Rabs, coiled-coil tethers, and vesicular coats. Here, we review our current knowledge of COG-related trafficking and glycosylation defects in humans and model organisms, and analyze possible scenarios for the molecular mechanism of the COG orchestrated vesicle targeting.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCell MembraneGolgi ApparatusHumansLipid MetabolismCOG complexglycosylationGolgiSNAREtethersvesicular trafficking

Identifiers

PMID31381138
PMCPMC6771879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.