ArticleJAMA neurology2019
Association of Levels of Specialized Care With Risk of Premature Mortality in Patients With Epilepsy.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Observational
- Hospital-treated infectious diseases and the risk of epilepsy in older age.Nature aging · 2025Article
- Telemedicine for persons with epilepsy in India: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Why patients say no: Patient barriers to epilepsy surgery among patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in Singapore.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Trends in epilepsy mortality of three incidence cohorts across 2006-2023 in Sweden: a matched register-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Ensuring Access to Neurologic Care: Challenges and Opportunities.Seminars in neurology · 2025Review
- Level 4 seizure monitoring unit admissions are associated with reduced long-term health care costs.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Presence of interictal epileptiform EEG discharges implies increased risk of recurrence after the first unprovoked seizure: Report of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Review
- Presurgical Use of Cenobamate for Adult and Pediatric Patients Referred for Epilepsy Surgery: Expert Panel Recommendations.Neurology and therapy · 2024Review
- Hospital variation of outcomes in status epilepticus.Epilepsia · 2024Article
- Article
- Mortality, and life expectancy in Epilepsy and Status epilepticus-current trends and future aspects.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2023Review
- Education Research: Evaluation of Epilepsy Surgery Education in Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship Programs.Neurology. Education · 2022Article
- Article
- Factors Predicting Outcome After Intracranial EEG Evaluation in Patients With Medically Refractory Epilepsy.Neurology · 2022Article
- EEG as an indispensable tool during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of tribulations and successes.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- When and why US primary care providers do and do not refer their patients with new-onset seizures or existing epilepsy or seizure disorders to neurologists-2018 DocStyles.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with epilepsy are at an elevated risk of premature mortality. Interventions to reduce this risk are crucial. Objective: To determine if the level of care (non-neurologist, neurologist, or comprehensive epilepsy program) is negatively associated with the risk of premature mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective open cohort study, all adult patients 18 years or older who met the administrative case definition for incident epilepsy in linked databases (Alberta Health Services administrative health data and the Comprehensive Calgary Epilepsy Programme Registry [CEP]) inclusive of the years 2002 to 2016 were followed up until death or loss to follow-up. The final analyses were performed on May 1, 2019. Exposures: Evaluation by a non-neurologist, neurologist, or epileptologist. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was all-cause mortality. We used extended Cox models treating exposure to a neurologist or the CEP as time-varying covariates. Age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, disease severity, and comorbid burden at index date were modeled as fixed-time coefficients. Results: A total 23 653 incident cases were identified (annual incidence of 89 per 100 000); the mean age (SD) at index date was 50.8 (19.1) years and 12 158 (50.3%) were women. A total of 14 099 (60%) were not exposed to specialist neurological care, 9554 (40%) received care by a neurologist, and 2054 (9%) received care in the CEP. In total, 4098 deaths (71%) occurred in the nonspecialist setting, 1481 (26%) for those seen by a neurologist, and 176 (3%) for those receiving CEP care. The standardized mortality rate was 7.2% for the entire cohort, 9.4% for those receiving nonspecialist care, 5.6% for those seen by a neurologist, and 2.8% for those seen in the CEP. The hazard ratio (HR) of mortality was lower in those receiving neurologist (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93) and CEP (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38-0.62) care. In multivariable modeling, specialist care, the age at index, and disease severity were retained in the final model of the association between specialist care and mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Exposure to specialist care is associated with incremental reductions in the hazard of premature mortality. Those referred to a comprehensive epilepsy program received the greatest benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.