ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2019
Clinical features and outcomes of patients with myasthenia gravis.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive review on myasthenia gravis: patho-physiology, diagnosis, management strategies.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Review
- Defective autophagy and autophagy activators in myasthenia gravis: a rare entity and unusual scenario.Autophagy · 2024Review
- Therapeutic and prognostic features in myasthenia gravis patients followed in a tertiary neuromuscular diseases center in Turkey.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Outcomes and characteristics of myasthenia gravis: A 10-year retrospective cross-sectional study at King Fahad Medical City.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2022Article
- The Dental Management of Pediatric Patient Diagnosed with Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report.European journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 in AChR Myasthenia Gravis and the Safety of Vaccines: Data from an Italian Cohort.Neurology international · 2022Article
- Clinical delineation of myasthenia gravis in the Kingdom of Bahrain.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2022Observational
- Article
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Cross-Sectional Study of Two Tertiary Hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Behavioural neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report clinical and laboratory features and outcomes of patients with autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG) recruited from a single center in Saudi Arabia.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data obtained from MG patients who have undergone examination and follow-up at our neuromuscular clinic between August 1, 2014 and January 31, 2019.
resultsNinety-five patients (55 females) were included. The mean age of onset of MG was 40.5+/-18.1 years in males and 31.3+/-15 years in females (p=0.009). The mean duration of follow-up at our clinic was 34.7+/-14.1 months, while the mean duration since MG onset was 8.0+/-7.2 years. Of all patients, 92.6% had generalized MG, 82.1% had acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies, 4.2% had muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies, 78.9% had early-onset MG with no second peak after age of 50 years, 22.1% had myasthenia crisis, 12.6% had refractory MG, 31.6% had thymic hyperplasia, 10.5% had thymoma, and 61.1% required more than or equal 2 immunosuppressive therapies. At the last follow-up, 93 patients had achieved an optimal outcome (MG Foundation of America classification less than or equal II). No patient with double-seronegative (dSN)-MG had thymoma, needed rituximab or intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance therapy, or was classified as refractory MG.
conclusionContrary to other studies, we did not observe a second-peak of MG onset. Clinical outcomes were favorable in the majority of our patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.