Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380467›Full record

ReviewApplied in vitro toxicology2018

Through the Looking Glass:

Samantha C Faber, Shaun D McCullough

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied in vitro toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for theFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Human Multi-CompartmentFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Advancing humanExpert opinion on drug delivery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha C FaberCurriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Shaun D McCulloughNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Research Triangle Park Foundation · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With 7 million deaths reported annually from air pollution alone, it is evident that adverse effects of inhaled toxicant exposures remain a major public health concern in the 21st century. Assessment and characterization of the impacts of air pollutants on human health stems from epidemiological and clinical studies, which have linked both outdoor and indoor air contaminant exposure to adverse pulmonary and cardiovascular health outcomes. Studies in animal models support epidemiological findings and have been critical in identifying systemic effects of environmental chemicals on cognitive abilities, liver disease, and metabolic dysfunction following inhalation exposure. Likewise, traditional monoculture systems have aided in identifying biomarkers of susceptibility to inhaled toxicants and served as a screening platform for safety assessment of pulmonary toxicants. Despite their contributions,

Indexed as

inhalationinterindividual variabilityin vitrolungthree-dimensional modeltoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31380467
PMCPMC6067645
OpenAlexW2802981758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.